Anonymity following SDT Proceedings
28th July, 2016
Partner Paul Bennett has written this article on Anonymity following SDT Proceedings.
Recently, the High Court in the case of SRA v Spector  EWHC 37 (Admin) has reversed an order made by the SDT allowing the Third Respondent to remain anonymous despite him having been found guilty of an offence.
The Tribunal stated that whilst it understood that it is important for judgments to be published with the interests of transparency and that normally an application for anonymity would only be considered where no allegations were proved, they were satisfied that the circumstances were similar to those in the case of SRA v Grindod No.11030-2012. In that case, the Tribunal had granted anonymity to the Second and Third Respondent when they were found guilty of only technical breaches.
The High Court ruled that the Tribunal erred in law in making the anonymity order and that, “Open justice is a fundamental principle of the common law”. It was stated that the Tribunal failed to recognise the importance of the open justice principle, the Tribunal misconceived their own Publication Policy, the Tribunal’s wish to act consistently with Grindod provides no support for its decision and there was no secret to be preserved; the Third Respondent was identified in the public proceedings and he was named on the Court hearing lists which were still available on the SDT’s website. The High Court finished by stating, “There is no reason why Richard Spector should not be identified as the Third Respondent”.
If you are facing proceedings before the SDT and/or allegations from the SRA, contact our Professional Practices Department immediately who can provide you with specialist legal advice.
Professional Practices and Employment Law
You might also be interested in...
22nd November, 2018
Family Law Partner Sandy Edwards believes there is. Next week, from 26 to 30 November, Resolution, an organisation of 6,500 family lawyers and other professionals, will be promoting “Good Divorce Week” which will focus on how separating and divorcing couples can put their children’s needs first and limit the impact of conflict. The week falls during the government’s divorce... Read More »
16th November, 2018
It is reported that a quarter of all complaints dealt with by the Legal Ombudsman revolve around costs. Therefore to avoid complaints and confusion, it is important to be clear from the outset. The new Transparency Rules (which the SRA have now confirmed will come into effect on 6 December 2018) require that accurate and relevant information is... Read More »
5th November, 2018
Aaron & Partners LLP has once again seen improved rankings in The Legal 500 – a comprehensive guide... Read More »