Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Manchester 0844 800 8346

Pall Mall Court
61-67 King Street
Manchester M2 4PD

Send us a message
Our Offices

Anonymity following SDT Proceedings

28th July, 2016

Partner Paul Bennett has written this article on Anonymity following SDT Proceedings.

Recently, the High Court in the case of SRA v Spector [2016] EWHC 37 (Admin) has reversed an order made by the SDT allowing the Third Respondent to remain anonymous despite him having been found guilty of an offence.

The Tribunal stated that whilst it understood that it is important for judgments to be published with the interests of transparency and that normally an application for anonymity would only be considered where no allegations were proved, they were satisfied that the circumstances were similar to those in the case of SRA v Grindod No.11030-2012. In that case, the Tribunal had granted anonymity to the Second and Third Respondent when they were found guilty of only technical breaches.

The High Court ruled that the Tribunal erred in law in making the anonymity order and that, “Open justice is a fundamental principle of the common law”. It was stated that the Tribunal failed to recognise the importance of the open justice principle, the Tribunal misconceived their own Publication Policy, the Tribunal’s wish to act consistently with Grindod provides no support for its decision and there was no secret to be preserved; the Third Respondent was identified in the public proceedings and he was named on the Court hearing lists which were still available on the SDT’s website. The High Court finished by stating, “There is no reason why Richard Spector should not be identified as the Third Respondent”.

If you are facing proceedings before the SDT and/or allegations from the SRA, contact our Professional Practices Department immediately who can provide you with specialist legal advice.

Paul Bennett

Professional Practices and Employment Law

01743 453685

[email protected]

You might also be interested in...

Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance: Run-off and alternative regulators

18th July, 2018

Special Focus: Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance Run-off – it dominates the thoughts of sole practitioners and partners in smaller law firms in my experience and restricts the ambitions of firms. The SRA could help law firms by relaxing their rules on run-off cover on their Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance to help firms merge or close more easily. This would protect... Read More »

Senior employment lawyer joins Theatr Clwyd board

17th July, 2018

Helen Watson, Head of Employment Law at Aaron & Partners LLP, has taken up an invitation to become a Trustee of both the Trust Board and the Main Board Theatr Clwyd has bolstered its senior leadership team with the appointment of an experienced employment law solicitor to support its vision of being at the forefront of theatre making... Read More »

Why there is more to CSR than just boosting a company’s ego

6th July, 2018

When a business invests in its community it deserves praise – but it must go beyond that, writes Helen Watson, a trustee at Claire House and partner at Aaron and Partners Solicitors. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the link between a company and the community in which it operates. As a trustee on charity boards including Claire House... Read More »

Contact Us