Business Must Live With Expert Share Valuation
6th October, 2014
A majority business owner who bitterly disagreed with an expert valuation of his company’s worth will have to pay more than £4 million to buy out his estranged co-owner’s minority shareholding, following a ruling of the Court of Appeal.
The majority owner owned 60 per cent of the company’s shares and his co-owner 40 per cent. After the pair fell out, the minority owner’s employment was terminated. He claimed, amongst other things, that his dismissal was unfair; however a compromise was reached whereby the majority owner and the company agreed to buy him out.
It was agreed that the valuation of the minority shareholding – which was no easy matter as the company’s success relied largely on trust and good working relationships – would be decided by a firm of accountants acting as expert. The accountants agreed their appointment and issued a letter of engagement setting out the terms of reference.
The majority owner and the company fiercely objected when the accountants reported that the minority shares were worth £4,218,000.
Their challenge to the valuation was, however, dismissed by a judge. I appealing against that decision, the majority owner and the company made wide-ranging criticisms of the accountant’s methodology and argued that the minority shares were only worth a fraction of the sum at which they had been valued.
However, in dismissing the appeal, the Court noted that the parties had voluntarily submitted the valuation exercise to the accountants and ruled that their report was binding, regardless of its alleged flaws. The Court observed, “Parties who refer a dispute to an expert must be taken to have recognised that mistakes may be made, both of fact and law, but they are prepared to take that risk because they place a high degree of confidence in their chosen expert.”
If you are in dispute with business partners or fellow shareholders, we can assist you to obtain a fair settlement please contact Nick Clarke on 01244 405558 or email [email protected]
You might also be interested in...
Why there is more to CSR than just boosting a company’s ego
6th July, 2018
When a business invests in its community it deserves praise – but it must go beyond that, writes Helen Watson, a trustee at Claire House and partner at Aaron and Partners Solicitors. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the link between a company and the community in which it operates. As a trustee on charity boards including Claire House... Read More »
Stuart Haynes reports on IAG Global – Wiesbaden 14th to 17th June 2018
4th July, 2018
Stuart Haynes, Corporate & Commercial Partner and IAG Global Board Member, reports on IAG Global – Wiesbaden held 14th to 17th June 2018 Stuart Haynes (IAG Global Board Member) Stuart Scott-Goldstone and Nick Clarke attended the recent IAG Global meeting in Wiesbaden which was held at the Grand Hotel Nassauer Hof from 14th – and 17th July 2018 The meeting... Read More »
DNA Test ordered in inheritance dispute where paternity questioned
6th June, 2018
Rhiannon Edwards, Solicitor in the Wills, Trusts and Tax department, discusses the recent judgement in the case of Nield-Moir v Freeman, where the High Court has ordered one of two daughters of Colin Birtles, who has died, to take a DNA test to prove paternity as part of an inheritance dispute In an unusual case, the High Court... Read More »