Chester 01244 405 555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester


Shrewsbury 01743 443043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Slide e

Airport City, Manchester 0161 537 3324

Offices 204 and 205
Manchester Business Park
3000 Aviator Way
Manchester M22 5TG

Calling in Sick to Work with a Hangover?!

Hungover Beer Imagery

30th September, 2019

You may have seen on social media this week that a lot of news outlets, including the BBC, are reporting that a German Court has officially ruled that a hangover is an ‘actual illness’ for the purposes of illness at work.

The case involved a German company that produced ‘anti-hangover’ powders, which contained plant extracts with antioxidants, electrolytes and vitamins, which they alleged were able to combat drowsiness, headaches and nausea, which are some of the main symptoms that accompany a hangover.

The case was brought by a consumer watchdog, on the basis that the health claims being made by the company were illegal.  Interestingly, neither party has been publicly identified.

Amongst many other things, the judgement stated that “information about a food product cannot ascribe any properties for preventing, treating or healing a human illness – or give the impression of such a property”. The judgement further went on to say that “by an illness, one should understand even small or temporary disruptions to the normal state or normal activity of the body”. By this, the court was referring to the temporary state of a hangover and the ‘disruptions to the normal state of the body’ that accompany it – i.e the headaches and nausea that the ‘anti-hangover’ powers claimed they could cure.

To briefly summarise the judgement, the court ruled that a food product (such as the powders being created by this company) could not lawfully claim to be able to cure an illness, and for the purposes of these health claims, a hangover would fall into this definition of an illness.

A lot of the UK news outlets reporting on this case have heavily focussed on the fact that the court has ruled that a hangover is an ‘official’ illness, and many allege or imply that, as a result of this ruling, employees are entitled to call in to work sick with a hangover without consequence, as the hangover should be treated by the employer as an official illness.

Unfortunately for employees, this is not the case at all. In any event and notwithstanding any jurisdictional issues, when the court ruled that that a hangover was an ‘illness’, this was in the context of food standards and not in relation to employment law whatsoever. Employees should be careful when reading unofficial news articles such as these, as it is easy to get caught out as the context of a court judgement can be very easily misinterpreted in the absence of legal advice.

For advice on sickness absence management, please contact Claire Brook on 01244 405 575 or email her directly at [email protected]

Claire Brook


Email: [email protected]
Tel: 01244 405 575

You might also be interested in...

Chester chosen to host prestigious international conference

9th May, 2022

Chester-based law firm Aaron & Partners will host delegates from all over the world in its home city... Read More »

Handholdingkeystohouse CovidandRentArrears–WhatdoesitmeanforCommercialLandlordsandTenants

Commercial Landlords v Commercial Tenants

4th May, 2022

In light of the ongoing challenges for commercial landlords where their tenants are failing to pay, this article... Read More »

two people removing wedding rings

End of the ‘blame game’ in sight

8th April, 2022

There are significant changes that have been made to divorce law and procedure in England and Wales with... Read More »

Contact Us