Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Airport City, Manchester 0844 800 8346

Office 129
Manchester Business Park
3000 Aviator Way
Manchester M22 5TG

Send us a message
Our Offices

Complete Exclusion Necessary to Justify Claim of Possession

28th March, 2013

When a tenant takes a lease, one of the things that they are almost invariably required to agree not to do is part with possession of the let premises without the written agreement of the landlord.

However, the commercial reality is that there are many circumstances in which the tenant of commercial premises might allow another person or business to share or use part of the let premises for their own purposes.

When another person is permitted to use the tenant’s premises, the question arises as to at what point that can be described as parting with possession in contravention of the lease covenant.

A recent High Court case dealt with this issue. It involved a company that leased land which it allowed Ford to use for the storage of vehicles prior to their despatch to dealers. Ford wished to take the storage of the vehicles ‘in house’, so it relied on an agreement made with the tenant some years ago that it could occupy the site under licence or call for an underlease.

Regrettably for Ford, the landlord refused to agree to an underlease and sought possession of the property on the ground that the tenant had parted with possession of it in violation of the covenant in the lease.

The Court found that whilst Ford did exercise day-to-day control over the business activities on the site, the tenant had not parted with possession of it. To have done so, Ford would have needed to have completely excluded the tenant from the property.

Occupation and possession is not the same thing in law and whilst Ford clearly occupied the premises, it could not be said to have taken possession of them in the sense that its control was total and exclusive.

For advice on all aspects of commercial property law, contact Simon Ellis on 01244 405516 or at [email protected]

 

 

You might also be interested in...

Vicky Burgess - Bankruptcy Article

Anullying a Bankruptcy Order

12th December, 2019

This article explains that a bankruptcy order can be undone and is not necessarily a point of no... Read More »

corporate article jennifer harrison

Agency or Distribution?

4th December, 2019

When looking to market, sell or distribute its products a supplier may choose to appoint an agent or... Read More »

Images for Newsletter - December

Employment Law Newsletter – December Issue 2019

2nd December, 2019

Welcome to our new-look Employment Newsletter.   If you would like to contact a member of the Employment... Read More »

Contact Us