Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Manchester 0844 800 8346

Pall Mall Court
61-67 King Street
Manchester M2 4PD

Send us a message
Our Offices

Complete Exclusion Necessary to Justify Claim of Possession

28th March, 2013

When a tenant takes a lease, one of the things that they are almost invariably required to agree not to do is part with possession of the let premises without the written agreement of the landlord.

However, the commercial reality is that there are many circumstances in which the tenant of commercial premises might allow another person or business to share or use part of the let premises for their own purposes.

When another person is permitted to use the tenant’s premises, the question arises as to at what point that can be described as parting with possession in contravention of the lease covenant.

A recent High Court case dealt with this issue. It involved a company that leased land which it allowed Ford to use for the storage of vehicles prior to their despatch to dealers. Ford wished to take the storage of the vehicles ‘in house’, so it relied on an agreement made with the tenant some years ago that it could occupy the site under licence or call for an underlease.

Regrettably for Ford, the landlord refused to agree to an underlease and sought possession of the property on the ground that the tenant had parted with possession of it in violation of the covenant in the lease.

The Court found that whilst Ford did exercise day-to-day control over the business activities on the site, the tenant had not parted with possession of it. To have done so, Ford would have needed to have completely excluded the tenant from the property.

Occupation and possession is not the same thing in law and whilst Ford clearly occupied the premises, it could not be said to have taken possession of them in the sense that its control was total and exclusive.

For advice on all aspects of commercial property law, contact Simon Ellis on 01244 405516 or at [email protected]

 

 

You might also be interested in...

Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance: Run-off and alternative regulators

18th July, 2018

Special Focus: Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance Run-off – it dominates the thoughts of sole practitioners and partners in smaller law firms in my experience and restricts the ambitions of firms. The SRA could help law firms by relaxing their rules on run-off cover on their Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance to help firms merge or close more easily. This would protect... Read More »

Senior employment lawyer joins Theatr Clwyd board

17th July, 2018

Helen Watson, Head of Employment Law at Aaron & Partners LLP, has taken up an invitation to become a Trustee of both the Trust Board and the Main Board Theatr Clwyd has bolstered its senior leadership team with the appointment of an experienced employment law solicitor to support its vision of being at the forefront of theatre making... Read More »

Why there is more to CSR than just boosting a company’s ego

6th July, 2018

When a business invests in its community it deserves praise – but it must go beyond that, writes Helen Watson, a trustee at Claire House and partner at Aaron and Partners Solicitors. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the link between a company and the community in which it operates. As a trustee on charity boards including Claire House... Read More »

Contact Us