Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Airport City, Manchester 0844 800 8346

Office 129
Manchester Business Park
3000 Aviator Way
Manchester M22 5TG

Send us a message
Our Offices

Complete Exclusion Necessary to Justify Claim of Possession

28th March, 2013

When a tenant takes a lease, one of the things that they are almost invariably required to agree not to do is part with possession of the let premises without the written agreement of the landlord.

However, the commercial reality is that there are many circumstances in which the tenant of commercial premises might allow another person or business to share or use part of the let premises for their own purposes.

When another person is permitted to use the tenant’s premises, the question arises as to at what point that can be described as parting with possession in contravention of the lease covenant.

A recent High Court case dealt with this issue. It involved a company that leased land which it allowed Ford to use for the storage of vehicles prior to their despatch to dealers. Ford wished to take the storage of the vehicles ‘in house’, so it relied on an agreement made with the tenant some years ago that it could occupy the site under licence or call for an underlease.

Regrettably for Ford, the landlord refused to agree to an underlease and sought possession of the property on the ground that the tenant had parted with possession of it in violation of the covenant in the lease.

The Court found that whilst Ford did exercise day-to-day control over the business activities on the site, the tenant had not parted with possession of it. To have done so, Ford would have needed to have completely excluded the tenant from the property.

Occupation and possession is not the same thing in law and whilst Ford clearly occupied the premises, it could not be said to have taken possession of them in the sense that its control was total and exclusive.

For advice on all aspects of commercial property law, contact Simon Ellis on 01244 405516 or at [email protected]

 

 

You might also be interested in...

Ethics Guidance – Transparency in Price and Service

16th November, 2018

It is reported that a quarter of all complaints dealt with by the Legal Ombudsman revolve around costs therefore to avoid complaints and confusion, it is important to be clear from the outset. The new Transparency Rules (which the SRA have now confirmed will come into effect on 6 December 2018) require that accurate and relevant information is... Read More »

Aaron & Partners Increases Recommendations in Leading Industry Guide, The Legal 500

5th November, 2018

Aaron & Partners LLP has once again seen improved rankings in The Legal 500 – a comprehensive guide... Read More »

Mental Health and Stress in the Workplace – 3/3

10th October, 2018

In the lead up to World Mental Health Day on 10 October 2018, we have been posting a series of short articles discussing mental health and stress in the workplace. In this final article, we will be providing tips, to employers and employees, for managing stress and dealing with mental ill health in the workplace. Click here to... Read More »

Contact Us