Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Manchester 0844 800 8346

Pall Mall Court
61-67 King Street
Manchester M2 4PD

Send us a message
Our Offices

Court of Appeal rules that Whistleblowing Partner is not protected

3rd January, 2013

A ‘worker’ who acts as a ‘whistleblower’ – disclosing breaches of the law – receives statutory protection under the law if he or she suffers detrimental treatment as a result of having made the protected disclosure to the appropriate authorities.

In the recent case of Clyde and Co LLP v Bates Van Winkelhof, a partner in a law firm acted as a whistleblower, accusing a fellow partner of engaging in criminal activity including money laundering and bribery.

She claimed to have suffered a detriment and sought to rely on the legislation protecting workers, claiming that her disclosures were ‘protected disclosures’.  However, the Court of Appeal rejected her argument, concluding that for such disclosures to be protected by the legislation, there had to be ‘a hierarchical relationship whereby the worker is to some extent subordinate to the employer’.  This could not apply to an equity partner.  The facts of the case are complex as it involved a Tanzanian joint venture, but the principals are clear.

The Court found that the whistleblowing legislation does not protect equity partners.  This puts someone who becomes aware of criminal misdeeds on the part of their fellow partners in a difficult position, particularly as partners can be jointly and severally liable for losses to the partnership that result from the activities of their fellow partners.

The case does not look at the LLP Members’ Agreement in place at the time.  The right for the LLP to expel members without reason (so long as it is not discriminatory) is usually included.  There may have been other routes open to the whistleblower to challenge the offending behaviour; we do not know.  The LLP Agreement should create a duty of good faith for all members and also a duty to comply with legislation, in this case anti-bribery rules.

If you find yourself in such a position, contact Mark Briegal on 01244 405563 or at [email protected] for advice on what steps to take.

 

 

 

 

You might also be interested in...

Legal expert’s data protection workshops pull in the crowds

22nd May, 2018

With the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) coming into force in May, businesses across Shropshire have been flocking to hear more about the new laws Paul Bennett, a partner at law firm Aaron & Partners LLP, has been delivering seminars in partnership with the Shropshire Chamber of Commerce An employment solicitor from Shrewsbury is urging businesses across the... Read More »

Experienced HR leader joins Aaron & Partners LLP

15th May, 2018

Experienced HR leader joins Aaron & Partners LLP Law firm with offices in Chester and Shrewsbury appoints Kate Robertson to drive HR strategy for more than 120 staff and to support the company’s growth Chester law firm Aaron & Partners LLP has strengthened its senior leadership team with the appointment of an experienced human resources manager. Kate Robertson... Read More »

When you should NOT pay the bailiff…

24th April, 2018

Jan Chillery, Insolvency Partner at Aaron & Partners LLP, shares her experience and the reasons why we should be cautious before paying so-called “bailiffs” over the phone or online without vetting them first. My neighbour has told me that recently he had a CCJ (County Court Judgment) against him. A day or so later, he received a phone call... Read More »

Contact Us