Chester 01244 405 555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester


Shrewsbury 01743 443043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Slide e

Airport City, Manchester 0161 537 3324

Offices 204 and 205
Manchester Business Park
3000 Aviator Way
Manchester M22 5TG

Defending or Bringing a potential Inheritance Act Claim

administration banking blur

17th May, 2019

The recent judgement in Wellesley v Wellesley follows the developing line of claims brought by adult children who are disappointed by the contents of their parents’ Wills.

This case involved the estate of Garrett Wellesley, the 7th Earl of Cowley. Tara Wellesley was one of two children of the Earl’s first marriage.

By his Will, executed two days before his death at the age of 82, the Earl left £20,000, out of a net estate of £1.3 million, to Tara. The remainder of the estate was split between various charities, the Earl’s other children and stepchildren, and his fourth wife.

Tara had been estranged from her father for 30 years prior to his death. Her only income came from state benefits, although she stated in her claim that she was an aspiring artist.

Tara brought a claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. She argued that the £20,000 legacy from her father did not constitute ‘reasonable financial provision’ on the basis that she was not able to meet her own financial needs which she cited as including, amongst others; provision for her disabled son, provision for treatment for her own ADHD and funding to allow her to undertake a fine art qualification and to acquire studio space.

Tara’s application was unsuccessful on two grounds:

  • Tara’s income covered her outgoings, if only leaving a small amount left over.
  • Tara was considered by the Court to have been responsible for her estrangement from her father, which had been due to her involvement with drugs.

The judge held that the significant period of estrangement outweighed the other factors upon which Tara was relying and on this basis did not award Tara any further funds from her late father’s estate.

This case shows a departure from the trend for successful claims being brought by estranged adult children, which gathered momentum after the much publicised Supreme Court  appeal in the case of Illot v Mitson in which a disappointed daughter was ultimately  awarded £50,000 from the estate of her late mother despite having been estranged from her for a period of 26 years prior to her death.

If you would like any more information about defending or bringing a potential Inheritance Act claim, please contact our Contentious Probate experts James Wallace and Rhiannon Edwards.

James Wallace

Wills, Trusts and Tax

Email: [email protected]
Tel: 01244 405 588

You might also be interested in...

Chester chosen to host prestigious international conference

9th May, 2022

Chester-based law firm Aaron & Partners will host delegates from all over the world in its home city... Read More »

Handholdingkeystohouse CovidandRentArrears–WhatdoesitmeanforCommercialLandlordsandTenants

Commercial Landlords v Commercial Tenants

4th May, 2022

In light of the ongoing challenges for commercial landlords where their tenants are failing to pay, this article... Read More »

two people removing wedding rings

End of the ‘blame game’ in sight

8th April, 2022

There are significant changes that have been made to divorce law and procedure in England and Wales with... Read More »

Contact Us