Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Airport City, Manchester 0844 800 8346

Office 129
Manchester Business Park
3000 Aviator Way
Manchester M22 5TG

Send us a message
Our Offices

Defending or Bringing a potential Inheritance Act Claim

17th May, 2019

The recent judgement in Wellesley v Wellesley follows the developing line of claims brought by adult children who are disappointed by the contents of their parents’ Wills.

This case involved the estate of Garrett Wellesley, the 7th Earl of Cowley. Tara Wellesley was one of two children of the Earl’s first marriage.

By his Will, executed two days before his death at the age of 82, the Earl left £20,000, out of a net estate of £1.3 million, to Tara. The remainder of the estate was split between various charities, the Earl’s other children and stepchildren, and his fourth wife.

Tara had been estranged from her father for 30 years prior to his death. Her only income came from state benefits, although she stated in her claim that she was an aspiring artist.

Tara brought a claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. She argued that the £20,000 legacy from her father did not constitute ‘reasonable financial provision’ on the basis that she was not able to meet her own financial needs which she cited as including, amongst others; provision for her disabled son, provision for treatment for her own ADHD and funding to allow her to undertake a fine art qualification and to acquire studio space.

Tara’s application was unsuccessful on two grounds:

  • Tara’s income covered her outgoings, if only leaving a small amount left over.
  • Tara was considered by the Court to have been responsible for her estrangement from her father, which had been due to her involvement with drugs.

The judge held that the significant period of estrangement outweighed the other factors upon which Tara was relying and on this basis did not award Tara any further funds from her late father’s estate.

This case shows a departure from the trend for successful claims being brought by estranged adult children, which gathered momentum after the much publicised Supreme Court  appeal in the case of Illot v Mitson in which a disappointed daughter was ultimately  awarded £50,000 from the estate of her late mother despite having been estranged from her for a period of 26 years prior to her death.

If you would like any more information about defending or bringing a potential Inheritance Act claim, please contact our Contentious Probate experts James Wallace and Rhiannon Edwards.

James Wallace

Wills, Trusts and Tax

Email: [email protected]
Tel: 01244 405 588

You might also be interested in...

Why claiming inheritance tax relief is not simply horseplay

1st July, 2020

Agricultural property relief from Inheritance Tax has long been a valuable relief for estates, which when available can... Read More »

Governments Calls For Responsible Contractual Behaviour – What Does This Mean For You?

29th June, 2020

In May 2020 the UK Government released additional guidance in connection with the Covid-19 pandemic, this time in... Read More »

Solicitors go wild with adoption drive for Chester Zoo

29th June, 2020

Giraffes, Orangutans and Red Pandas are amongst the animals adopted by employees at the legal practice to help... Read More »

Contact Us
Secured By miniOrange