Detriment claim runs from the date of the employer’s decision
15th December, 2014
Detriment claim runs from the date of the employer’s actual decision, not when employee finds out of it
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has clarified in the case of McKinney v London Borough of Newham that where an employer makes a decision that is allegedly to the detriment of the employee on the grounds that they have made a “protected disclosure” (section 47B(1), ERA 1996), the three month time limit for bringing a claim runs from the date of the actual decision and not from when the employee learnt of it.
The Claimant brought his case to the Employment Tribunal (ET) on 11 January 2011 in respect of a decision that he felt amounted to detrimental treatment which was made on 8 October 2010 (the Claimant had learnt of the Employer’s decision on 14 October 2010). His claim was struck out by the ET for being out of time.
The Claimant appealed to the EAT who upheld the ET’s decision to not allow the claim on the basis that it is out of time. The EAT analysed a range of authorities and concluded that there is no material difference between the detriment provisions of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and Equality Act 2010 and confirming that time begins to run from when the employer made the decision, not when the employee became aware of it. The EAT confirmed that the time to bring a claim runs from the date of the employer’s decision, in this case on 8 October, and therefore the claim made was out of time.
Whilst this decision will be welcomed by employers, it is essential that employers seek to prevent whistleblowing claims arising from detrimental treatment by implementing a comprehensive Whistleblowing Policy and seeking professional legal advice prior to making any decision that may be determined to be detrimental treatment on the grounds that the employee has made a protected disclosure.
For further information and advice on whistleblowing, please contact Helen Watson on 01244 405565 or send an email to [email protected].
You might also be interested in...
9th August, 2018
We have been approached by a number of clients who have received a statutory demand, either personally or to their company, and they have asked us what to do about it. One business was contacted by a company demanding payment of a debt owed under a contract for TV advertising in a shopping mall. We presume – but... Read More »
3rd August, 2018
Agriculture and Estates specialist Ben Brassington has strengthened the services offered by Top 200 legal firm Aaron & Partners LLP A dairy farmer with more than 18 years’ experience as a Partner in his family’s farming business has been appointed by a top legal firm in Shrewsbury. Ben Brassington, who has also been working for several years as... Read More »