Detriment claim runs from the date of the employer’s decision
15th December, 2014
Detriment claim runs from the date of the employer’s actual decision, not when employee finds out of it
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has clarified in the case of McKinney v London Borough of Newham that where an employer makes a decision that is allegedly to the detriment of the employee on the grounds that they have made a “protected disclosure” (section 47B(1), ERA 1996), the three month time limit for bringing a claim runs from the date of the actual decision and not from when the employee learnt of it.
The Claimant brought his case to the Employment Tribunal (ET) on 11 January 2011 in respect of a decision that he felt amounted to detrimental treatment which was made on 8 October 2010 (the Claimant had learnt of the Employer’s decision on 14 October 2010). His claim was struck out by the ET for being out of time.
The Claimant appealed to the EAT who upheld the ET’s decision to not allow the claim on the basis that it is out of time. The EAT analysed a range of authorities and concluded that there is no material difference between the detriment provisions of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and Equality Act 2010 and confirming that time begins to run from when the employer made the decision, not when the employee became aware of it. The EAT confirmed that the time to bring a claim runs from the date of the employer’s decision, in this case on 8 October, and therefore the claim made was out of time.
Whilst this decision will be welcomed by employers, it is essential that employers seek to prevent whistleblowing claims arising from detrimental treatment by implementing a comprehensive Whistleblowing Policy and seeking professional legal advice prior to making any decision that may be determined to be detrimental treatment on the grounds that the employee has made a protected disclosure.
For further information and advice on whistleblowing, please contact Helen Watson on 01244 405565 or send an email to [email protected].
You might also be interested in...
18th July, 2018
Special Focus: Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance Run-off – it dominates the thoughts of sole practitioners and partners in smaller law firms in my experience and restricts the ambitions of firms. The SRA could help law firms by relaxing their rules on run-off cover on their Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance to help firms merge or close more easily. This would protect... Read More »
17th July, 2018
Helen Watson, Head of Employment Law at Aaron & Partners LLP, has taken up an invitation to become a Trustee of both the Trust Board and the Main Board Theatr Clwyd has bolstered its senior leadership team with the appointment of an experienced employment law solicitor to support its vision of being at the forefront of theatre making... Read More »
6th July, 2018
When a business invests in its community it deserves praise – but it must go beyond that, writes Helen Watson, a trustee at Claire House and partner at Aaron and Partners Solicitors. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the link between a company and the community in which it operates. As a trustee on charity boards including Claire House... Read More »