Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Manchester 0844 800 8346

Pall Mall Court
61-67 King Street
Manchester M2 4PD

Send us a message
Our Offices

Dismissing Lazy Employees

27th October, 2011

A leaked government report has created uproar in the employment sector by suggesting that unproductive employees should lose their right to claim unfair dismissal.  The report, obtained by the Daily Telegraph, argues that this would mean that more capable people would replace those sacked, thus boosting economic growth.  It is suggested in the report that “in the long run it will increase employment by making businesses more competitive and hence more likely to grow.”

The author of the report was Adrian Beecroft, a venture capitalist and Conservative Party donor.  Mr Beecroft says that under current rules employees can “coast along” with some proving impossible to sack.

Mr Beecroft recommends a Compensated No Fault Dismissal regulation, which would allow employers to sack unproductive staff with only basic redundancy pay and notice. He does however concede that the new scheme could lead to employers firing staff because they “did not like them”.  The report, commissioned by David Cameron, says that current rules on unfair dismissal impacts terribly “on the efficiency and hence competitiveness of our businesses, and on the effectiveness and cost of our public services.”  It goes on to say that the rules make it difficult to prove that someone deserves to be dismissed and the process now is so lengthy and complex it makes it hard to implement.

This comes just weeks after the Chancellor George Osborne announcing new measures to restrict the number of unfair dismissal claims.  From April 2012 an employee must have two years continuous employment before being able to bring an unfair dismissal claim and from 2013 fees will be introduced to a tribunal claim.

Trade Unions have attacked the report, warning that the move would “horrify” workers.  Sarah Veale, Head of the Equality and Employment Rights department at the TUC, said that the proposals were “profoundly unjust” and that the Prime Minister should “throw the report straight in the bin.”  According to the Daily Telegraph, Downing Street was not planning to release the analysis but the report is now expected to be published later this year.

 

You might also be interested in...

Why there is more to CSR than just boosting a company’s ego

6th July, 2018

When a business invests in its community it deserves praise – but it must go beyond that, writes Helen Watson, a trustee at Claire House and partner at Aaron and Partners Solicitors. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the link between a company and the community in which it operates. As a trustee on charity boards including Claire House... Read More »

Stuart Haynes reports on IAG Global – Wiesbaden 14th to 17th June 2018

4th July, 2018

Stuart Haynes, Corporate & Commercial Partner and IAG Global Board Member, reports on IAG Global – Wiesbaden held 14th to 17th June 2018 Stuart Haynes (IAG Global Board Member) Stuart Scott-Goldstone and Nick Clarke attended the recent IAG Global meeting in Wiesbaden which was held at the Grand Hotel Nassauer Hof from 14th – and 17th July 2018 The meeting... Read More »

DNA Test ordered in inheritance dispute where paternity questioned

6th June, 2018

Rhiannon Edwards, Solicitor in the Wills, Trusts and Tax department, discusses the recent judgement in the case of Nield-Moir v Freeman, where the High Court has ordered one of two daughters of Colin Birtles, who has died, to take a DNA test to prove paternity as part of an inheritance dispute In an unusual case, the High Court... Read More »

Contact Us