Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Airport City, Manchester 0844 800 8346

Office 129
Manchester Business Park
3000 Aviator Way
Manchester M22 5TG

Send us a message
Our Offices

Employment Tribunal Awards Record Costs of £100,000

31st August, 2011

A case was reported in the Telegraph earlier this month which is sure to send out a message to employees who are considering making a false claim against their employer. This involved a multi-millionaire chairman of a recruitment company in the Midlands, Mr Watts, who was accused of victimisation and discrimination by his former executive, Debbie Smith. She pursued her claim to the Employment Tribunal, arguing that he had made degrading and offensive comments towards her; and that he had even called her a “sexy nurse”.

However, the Tribunal decided that Ms Smith’s claim was false and ordered her to pay Mr Watts a record £100,000 by way of costs. There is usually a cap of £10,000 on costs awarded however, the Tribunal is able to award a higher figure if they require a detailed assessment of costs. Usually, Tribunals are very reluctant to award costs to the successful party and even when they do so, the median cost award has been reported as only £1,000 (according to the statistics from the Tribunal from the 1April 2009 to 31 March 2010).

The Telegraph reported that Mr Watts commented subsequently: “what I’d like this to do is send a message to all the opportunists and chancers and vexatious spongers who bring these cases that it can backfire……It’s crippling the economy. Running a business, especially a small business, has become a nightmare. The time and the money involved in fighting cases just makes the whole thing prohibitive for employers. All this has happened by slight of hand. All in the name of employee protection. So we’ve now got something like 40,000 different employment laws and regulations to deal with – most of them imposed from Europe – and if you can’t find grounds for a case in that lot, you aren’t trying.” This case demonstrates that there may be some redress available where employers are successful in defending spurious claims.

For further advice on any of the issues raised in this article, please do not hesitate to contact Claire Brook, Partner, Employment Team at [email protected]

You might also be interested in...

Is there such a thing as a good divorce?

22nd November, 2018

Family Law Partner Sandy Edwards believes there is. Next week, from 26 to 30 November, Resolution, an organisation of 6,500 family lawyers and other professionals, will be promoting “Good Divorce Week” which will focus on how separating and divorcing couples can put their children’s needs first and limit the impact of conflict. The week falls during the government’s divorce... Read More »

Ethics Guidance – Transparency in Price and Service

16th November, 2018

It is reported that a quarter of all complaints dealt with by the Legal Ombudsman revolve around costs. Therefore to avoid complaints and confusion, it is important to be clear from the outset. The new Transparency Rules (which the SRA have now confirmed will come into effect on 6 December 2018) require that accurate and relevant information is... Read More »

Aaron & Partners Increases Recommendations in Leading Industry Guide, The Legal 500

5th November, 2018

Aaron & Partners LLP has once again seen improved rankings in The Legal 500 – a comprehensive guide... Read More »

Contact Us