Incorporation – Limited Company or LLP?
28th July, 2017
So, you want to incorporate? Incorporation provides limited liability and that is really useful. With a few exceptions, it means that a business failure may not affect your personal assets. It provides a vehicle for others to invest in your business and enables you to give a stake to key staff. It can also be tax efficient in some circumstances.
The first question to decide is whether to become a limited company or a limited liability partnership (LLP).
There are pros and cons to each and you need to think about the key elements of your business before you jump in – it’s not easy to change your mind later.
The key differences between limited companies and LLPs are around management and tax.
A limited company has directors and shareholders. Shareholders own the business and are rewarded by dividends if the company makes a profit and by an increase in the value of the shares if the company becomes worth more. The shareholders appoint the directors who run the business. The shareholders only have the right to veto key decisions and have limited rights to information and no right to run the business on a day to day level. A majority of shareholders can remove the directors.
An LLP has members (often referred to as partners) who both own and have a right to run the LLP. There is no difference between owners and mangers in an LLP, although separate rights can be artificially created, in the same way that shareholders can be granted management rights in a limited company. Both structures require a detailed constitution document – a Members’ Agreement for an LLP and a Shareholders’ Agreement for limited company.
The second issue is around tax. A company is taxed on its profits and pays corporation tax, currently at 20% reducing to 17%, on its profits. The directors are employees and are paid salary under PAYE and the company pays employers’ National Insurance at 13.8% on their salaries. Shareholders can take dividends out of profits which are taxed at dividend rates.
A simple view of the difference in tax is as follows (please remember that this is just an example at one profit level and that individual’s circumstances will differ and you need professional tax advice from your accountant):
|LLP||Company (PAYE)||Company (Dividends)|
|Available profit||£ 100,000||£ 100,000||£ 100,000|
|Available to pay||100,000||88,857||80,000|
|Class 2/4 NI||(4,431)|
|Post Tax Income||£ 66,369||£ 59,004||£ 65,950|
|Overall tax rate||33.6%||41.0%||34.1%|
If a company is making large profits which the owners do not need to extract, it is often better to shelter them in a limited company, having paid 20% tax, whereas if the owners remove all the profit each year, then an LLP can be more tax efficient.
There are other differences which will make a difference to your choice. Limited Companies can have tax efficient share schemes, which can be good for incentivising employees, especially if a sale is planned. However, in an LLP, especially one providing professional services, it is easy to make senior employees into members (it usually requires a capital contribution, but the firm can generally arrange the funding) saving the business 13.8% Employers NI and making them self employed which is usually an advantage.
LLPS have more flexibility, as there is no need to keep set amounts of capital and it is easy to change the capital between members from year to year.
When it comes to people leaving, an LLP is again more flexible. A retirement can be done with a s short, simple deed of retirement. In a limited company, there can be a lot of paperwork, especially if the company decides to buy back the leaver’s shares.
I was recently instructed on two similar jobs; both were small firms where an older partner was retiring and the younger partners were continuing. One was an LLP and the other a limited company. For the LLP I drafted a four page deed of retirement and for the limited company I drafted 14 different documents!
The final issue to consider is that of culture. What feel do you want your organisation to have? Is it a collegiate style where everyone works together or a more corporate style with command and control? Again, there is no right and wrong – you need to decide.
In conclusion, the structures can be compared below:
|Separate Legal Personality||Y||Y|
|Publicly Available Accounts||Y||Y|
|Loss Relief on other Personal Income||Y||N|
|Entity Owns Assets||Y||Y|
|Separate Ownership / Management||N||Y|
|Tax Efficient Incentives||N||Y|
|Floating Charge over Assets||Y||Y|
|Capital Repayment Restrictions||N||Y|
|Tax on Retained profits||Y||N|
You might also be interested in...
6th July, 2018
When a business invests in its community it deserves praise – but it must go beyond that, writes Helen Watson, a trustee at Claire House and partner at Aaron and Partners Solicitors. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the link between a company and the community in which it operates. As a trustee on charity boards including Claire House... Read More »
4th July, 2018
Stuart Haynes, Corporate & Commercial Partner and IAG Global Board Member, reports on IAG Global – Wiesbaden held 14th to 17th June 2018 Stuart Haynes (IAG Global Board Member) Stuart Scott-Goldstone and Nick Clarke attended the recent IAG Global meeting in Wiesbaden which was held at the Grand Hotel Nassauer Hof from 14th – and 17th July 2018 The meeting... Read More »
6th June, 2018
Rhiannon Edwards, Solicitor in the Wills, Trusts and Tax department, discusses the recent judgement in the case of Nield-Moir v Freeman, where the High Court has ordered one of two daughters of Colin Birtles, who has died, to take a DNA test to prove paternity as part of an inheritance dispute In an unusual case, the High Court... Read More »