Lease Termination Notice Must Be in Specified Form, Rules Court
26th June, 2014
When a tenant failed to include precisely the right wording for exercising its right to break its lease, the court ruled that use of the exact words specified was not necessary and therefore disallowed the landlord’s claim that the break notice was invalid.
The landlord appealed to the Court of Appeal, which reversed the decision, holding that since the lease said that the notice ‘must’ be given in a specific form, giving the notice in another form rendered it invalid.
The case, which has now racked up very substantial legal fees, illustrates the importance of paying attention to the precise terms of a lease for both landlord and tenant. Had the notice been given by the tenant in the specified form in the first place, there would have been no argument.
We can assist you in drafting and negotiating break clauses, preparing and serving break notices and advising as to the validity of any break notices sent or received so as to help you avoid finding yourself in a similar situation to the parties in this case.
For more information on this or any other matter relating to lease notices, please email Trish Randles at [email protected].
You might also be interested in...
22nd May, 2019
There have been a number of Court decisions in recent years grappling with the application of established legal... Read More »
17th May, 2019
The recent judgement in Wellesley v Wellesley follows the developing line of claims brought by adult children who... Read More »
17th May, 2019
Businesswomen from across Shropshire have come together at an exclusive afternoon tea event held by law firm Aaron... Read More »