Chester 01244 405 555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester


Shrewsbury 01743 443043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Slide e

Airport City, Manchester 0161 537 3324

Offices 204 and 205
Manchester Business Park
3000 Aviator Way
Manchester M22 5TG

NHS nurse sacked over weekend working wins landmark ruling – Aaron and Partners Comment

NHS nurse sacked over weekend working wins landmark ruling Aaron and Partners Comment e

25th June, 2021

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has ruled that an employment tribunal failed to consider the “childcare disparity” faced by women when it said a nurse was not unfairly dismissed because she was unable to work weekends. The claimant’s case will now be revisited in the lower court.

The claimant, in this case, was a Community NHS Nurse who was unable to work new shift patterns introduced by her employer, the Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust North Cumbria. Due to childcare commitments for her three children, two of whom are disabled, the Claimant refused to work these new shifts. She was then informed that the Respondent had no other option but to issue a notice of dismissal and reengage the Claimant on the new terms requiring her to work additional days. She refused to sign the new terms and was subsequently dismissed. 

In reaction to this, Debbie Coyne, Employment Law Senior Associate at legal firm Aaron & Partners said:

“While the court’s ruling is a positive step, especially for women who are working mothers, it will likely have raised concerns for many employers. Businesses have had to, and still are facing a multitude of complex employment challenges as a result of the pandemic, and so it’s important that they have a clear understanding of what this ruling means for them.

“This case serves as a reminder for businesses to carefully consider whether any provision, criterion or practice (PCP) put in place will indirectly disadvantage individuals identified as having a protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010. In this case, the requirement to work flexibly, including at weekends meant the employer was indirectly disadvantaging women due to the fact that women, because of their childcare responsibilities, are less likely to accommodate certain working patterns than men.

“If, as in this case, the employee refuses to work the new shift pattern or raises concerns, careful consideration should be given by the employer, and they must consider alternative ways to meet the objective so that discrimination does not occur.

“Our advice to employers would be to consider and review their flexible working policies and consider those employees with caring responsibilities. Businesses should keep a record of their business aims when introducing new policies or changes in working practices and considerations given to discrimination issues that may arise and alternative options and to always seek legal advice if they have concerns.”

Original Article taken from The Guardian.

Debbie Coyne


Senior Associate
Email: [email protected]
Tel: 01244 405 537 / 07870 365 050

Contact us

You might also be interested in...

Chester chosen to host prestigious international conference

9th May, 2022

Chester-based law firm Aaron & Partners will host delegates from all over the world in its home city... Read More »

Handholdingkeystohouse CovidandRentArrears–WhatdoesitmeanforCommercialLandlordsandTenants

Commercial Landlords v Commercial Tenants

4th May, 2022

In light of the ongoing challenges for commercial landlords where their tenants are failing to pay, this article... Read More »

two people removing wedding rings

End of the ‘blame game’ in sight

8th April, 2022

There are significant changes that have been made to divorce law and procedure in England and Wales with... Read More »

Contact Us