Non-competition restrictive covenant held enforceable notwithstanding drafting error
7th April, 2014
In the recent case of Prophet plc v Huggett  EWHC 615 (Ch), the High Court considered the intentions of the parties to find that a poorly drafted restrictive covenant was enforceable, despite a drafting error.
The 12-month restriction was intended to prevent H from competing with, or working for, a competitor of P. H’s contract of employment defined competition as the provision of computer software systems for the fresh produce industry, produced by P.
Realistically, a competitor would never provide software which was produced by P therefore, on a literal reading, the restriction offered no protection to P whatsoever. Nevertheless, when H left his employment and began working for a competitor, P sought to enforce the restriction.
The High Court rejected H’s argument that the restriction correctly conveyed what it intended to and inserted three words into the restriction (“produced by P, or similar thereto”) in order that P’s intentions could be correctly reflected, and the appropriate protection provided by the restriction.
On the basis of the additional wording inserted into the restriction, the High Court granted P an injunction.
This case has highlighted how the court can exercise discretion to add words into restrictive covenants in favour of the employer. However, you should bear in mind that a court can also remove words and this is more likely to not be in the best interests of the employer. In order to ensure your business is protected from previous employees, we recommend instructing a specialist employment lawyer to properly draft enforceable restrictive covenants.
For further information and advice in relation to restrictive covenants, please contact Paul Bennett on 01743 453685 or send an email to [email protected].
You might also be interested in...
18th July, 2018
Special Focus: Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance Run-off – it dominates the thoughts of sole practitioners and partners in smaller law firms in my experience and restricts the ambitions of firms. The SRA could help law firms by relaxing their rules on run-off cover on their Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance to help firms merge or close more easily. This would protect... Read More »
17th July, 2018
Helen Watson, Head of Employment Law at Aaron & Partners LLP, has taken up an invitation to become a Trustee of both the Trust Board and the Main Board Theatr Clwyd has bolstered its senior leadership team with the appointment of an experienced employment law solicitor to support its vision of being at the forefront of theatre making... Read More »
6th July, 2018
When a business invests in its community it deserves praise – but it must go beyond that, writes Helen Watson, a trustee at Claire House and partner at Aaron and Partners Solicitors. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the link between a company and the community in which it operates. As a trustee on charity boards including Claire House... Read More »