Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Manchester 0844 800 8346

Pall Mall Court
61-67 King Street
Manchester M2 4PD

Send us a message
Our Offices

Penalty Clauses and Parking

8th December, 2015

Nobody likes paying parking fines and, over the years, some people have attempted to avoid paying them by claiming that a slightly tricky area of law around ‘Penalty Clauses’ applies to parking fines and they are therefore not enforceable.

The recent cases of Cavendish Square Holding BV v El Makdessi and ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis [2015] have looked at the law on this and it’s not good news for those who overstay their time. It also raises some more general points about Penalty Clauses as a whole.

The law has until now been interpreted so that penalty clauses are unenforceable. A clause has been regarded as a penalty clause if it requires the person who breaches the contract to pay to the innocent party a sum which is greater than the innocent party’s genuine pre-estimate of loss. By way of example, if you are having building work carried out for £20,000, it might be fair to put in a clause that says late completion will incur a reduction in price of £1,000, but it would be a penalty clause if it were for £25,000,

In these two recent cases, the Supreme Court has clarified that a clause will not necessarily be considered a penalty clause (and therefore be unenforceable) simply because the amount specified represents a greater sum than the loss actually incurred.

The courts will now consider the following tests to determine whether or not a clause is a penalty clause:

Stage 1: Does the clause relate to a Primary Obligation or Secondary Obligation?

A primary obligation is something that goes to the heart of the contract. Even if a clause is triggered by breach of a primary obligation it may be considered a primary obligation in its own right.

For example in the Cavendish case the disputed clause related to certain covenants (agreements to do or not do certain things) but it was considered to be a price adjustment clause and a primary obligation i.e. to ensure observance with the covenants contained in the relevant Agreement. Sums payable under a primary obligation will not trigger the rules against penalties.

If the clause is a secondary obligation triggered by a breach of a primary obligation the courts will move onto stage 2:

Stage 2: Is the Secondary Obligation out of proportion with the innocent party’s legitimate interest in performance of the primary obligation?

The court will consider whether the provision relates to a ‘genuine pre-estimate of the innocent party’s loss’; if it does, it will not be a penalty clause. If the sum payable represents a greater sum than the injured party’s pre-estimate of loss the court will consider whether the sum is ‘unconscionable or extravagant’, i.e. too large and may consider comparable industry standards.

Practical steps to ensure your breach of contract provisions are enforceable:

To avoid the rules on penalty clause, you, or your solicitor should consider whether the relevant provision can be drafted as a primary obligation e.g. a price adjustment clause.

If that is not possible, the provision should be drafted to make it clear what legitimate interest the innocent party would have in the enforcement of the primary obligation. For example, in the Beavis case ParkingEye had a legitimate interest in maximising the number of parking spaces available; by charging the sum of £85 to anyone parking for over the allocated two hours ParkingEye was supporting enforcement of their primary obligation of maximising parking spaces.

To justify the amount payable by (or deductible from) the party in breach, reference could be made to industry norms which will help to demonstrate that the sum is not extravagant.

For more information please contact Eve Lakin on 01244 405556 or email [email protected]

You might also be interested in...

Legal expert’s data protection workshops pull in the crowds

22nd May, 2018

With the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) coming into force in May, businesses across Shropshire have been flocking to hear more about the new laws Paul Bennett, a partner at law firm Aaron & Partners LLP, has been delivering seminars in partnership with the Shropshire Chamber of Commerce An employment solicitor from Shrewsbury is urging businesses across the... Read More »

Experienced HR leader joins Aaron & Partners LLP

15th May, 2018

Experienced HR leader joins Aaron & Partners LLP Law firm with offices in Chester and Shrewsbury appoints Kate Robertson to drive HR strategy for more than 120 staff and to support the company’s growth Chester law firm Aaron & Partners LLP has strengthened its senior leadership team with the appointment of an experienced human resources manager. Kate Robertson... Read More »

When you should NOT pay the bailiff…

24th April, 2018

Jan Chillery, Insolvency Partner at Aaron & Partners LLP, shares her experience and the reasons why we should be cautious before paying so-called “bailiffs” over the phone or online without vetting them first. My neighbour has told me that recently he had a CCJ (County Court Judgment) against him. A day or so later, he received a phone call... Read More »

Contact Us