Professional Indemnity Insurance: Related Matters and Transactions
4th August, 2016
Partner Paul Bennett has written this article on Professional Indemnity Insurance: Related Matters and Transactions.
The current Solicitors’ Minimum Terms and Conditions of Professional Indemnity Insurance stipulate that, all claims against any one or more insured arising from similar acts or omissions in a series of related matters or transactions will be regarded as one claim.
The benefit of this clause for the insured (the law firm) is that, if there are a string of claims, which together are less than the policy limit, the insured may state that they should be aggregated because they are related matters or transactions. The result being that the insured will only have to pay one policy excess. Conversely, if the claims, once aggregated, exceed the policy limit then the insurer may argue for aggregation so it would leave the insured with an uninsured loss if the claims were successful rather than the insurer paying out for each successful claim.
However, for either the insured or the insurer to be able to argue that claims should be aggregated, they need to be able to answer the question, how related do they have to be?
The Court of Appeal tried to answer this question recently in the case of AIG Europe v OC320301 LLP  EWCA Civ 367. The court said, “In our view it must, as Mr Edwards submitted, be an intrinsic rather than a remote relationship. That means that there must be a relationship of some kind between the transactions relied on rather than a relationship with some outside connecting factor, even if that extrinsic relationship is common to the transactions”.
Now, does anybody wish to comment on what amounts to an intrinsic relationship? It is a point we think will be litigated extensively moving forward.
Partner in Professional Practices and Employment
DD: 01743 453685
Email: [email protected]
You might also be interested in...
9th August, 2018
We have been approached by a number of clients who have received a statutory demand, either personally or to their company, and they have asked us what to do about it. One business was contacted by a company demanding payment of a debt owed under a contract for TV advertising in a shopping mall.Â We presume â€“ but... Read More »
3rd August, 2018
Agriculture and Estates specialist Ben Brassington has strengthened the services offered by Top 200 legal firm Aaron & Partners LLP A dairy farmer with more than 18 yearsâ€™ experience as a Partner in his familyâ€™s farming business has been appointed by a top legal firm in Shrewsbury. Ben Brassington, who has also been working for several years as... Read More »