Settlement Agreements and Lacking Mental Capacity
2nd December, 2016
The recent case of Glasgow City Council v Dahhan UKEAT/0024/15 considered whether an Employment Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide whether lack of mental capacity meant a settlement agreement was unenforceable.
Mr Dahhan was employed by Glasgow City Council as a teacher. He brought tribunal claims for direct discrimination, harassment and victimisation because of race but the parties entered into a settlement agreement whereby Mr Dahhan gave up all claims arising from his employment with the Council, with the exception of claims in respect of enforcing the agreement, personal injury claims not apparent at the time of signing and pension claims.
Mr Dahhan later wished to withdraw his claims which were dismissed under Rule 52 of Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. Mr Dahhan subsequently asked the tribunal to reconsider the dismissal of his claims, stating that he lacked capacity to instruct his solicitor and to make decisions at the time that he entered into the settlement agreement.
The Employment Judge held that the tribunal had jurisdiction to set aside the settlement agreement on the ground that it was invalid because Mr Dahhan did not have the capacity to contract at the time he entered into it.
The Council appealed the decision but the Employment Appeal Tribunal dismissed the appeal.
This is the first case to consider whether a tribunal has jurisdiction to set aside a settlement agreement due to a party not having contractual capacity at the time of entering into it.
If you are facing claims from an employee or would like to enter into a settlement agreement, contact our Employment Department for specialist legal advice.
 |
Ben MasonAssociate Employment Law |
You might also be interested in...
Is there such a thing as a good divorce?
22nd November, 2018
Family Law Partner Sandy Edwards believes there is. Next week, from 26 to 30 November, Resolution, an organisation of 6,500 family lawyers and other professionals, will be promoting “Good Divorce Week” which will focus on how separating and divorcing couples can put their children’s needs first and limit the impact of conflict. The week falls during the government’s divorce... Read More »
Ethics Guidance – Transparency in Price and Service
16th November, 2018
It is reported that a quarter of all complaints dealt with by the Legal Ombudsman revolve around costs. Therefore to avoid complaints and confusion, it is important to be clear from the outset. The new Transparency Rules (which the SRA have now confirmed will come into effect on 6 December 2018) require that accurate and relevant information is... Read More »
Aaron & Partners Increases Recommendations in Leading Industry Guide, The Legal 500
5th November, 2018
Aaron & Partners LLP has once again seen improved rankings in The Legal 500 – a comprehensive guide... Read More »