Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Airport City, Manchester 0844 800 8346

Office 129
Manchester Business Park
3000 Aviator Way
Manchester M22 5TG

Send us a message
Our Offices

Was reducing an employee’s hours for a fixed period reasonable adjustments?

29th November, 2013

Under Section 20(3) of the Equality Act 2010 an employer has a duty to make reasonable adjustments to accommodate disabled job applicants and employees where they would otherwise be placed at a substantial disadvantage.

Recent case law has raised the question; what amounts to reasonable adjustments?

In the case of Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Higgins UKEAT/0579/12/DM it was held that reducing an employee’s hours for a fixed period of time was sufficient under the reasonable adjustments duty and as such the claimant had not been discriminated against.

Mr Higgins, an employee of JobCentre Plus (“JCP”) in Liverpool, had a long period of sickness absence following which his “Fit Note” recommended a phased return to work through different hours for three months. Mr Higgins suggested that the return be over six months but JCP’s response was the suggestion of a Part-time Medical Grounds Plan which would enable Mr Higgins to return to his normal hours over 13 weeks. Mr Higgins rejected this and refused to return to work unless the timeframe was extended. His request to extend the Plan was refused and Mr Higgins was dismissed. He subsequently made a claim to the Employment Tribunal on the grounds that JCP had failed to make reasonable adjustments.

At first instance, the Employment Tribunal held that by failing to consider Mr Higgins’ requested extension, JCP was in breach of its duty to make reasonable adjustments.

On appeal by JCP, it was held that the provision criteria or practice placing Mr Higgins at a substantial disadvantage was incorrectly identified as the requirement for him to work. It should have been the requirement for him to work his contracted hours. It was held that the onus is not on an employer to allow an extension of a Fit Note given that they are often presented with Fit Notes lasting a fixed duration, as Mr Higgins’ did. If an extension to a Fit Note is required, the employee must seek to receive this from their GP.

It is correct to say that if, on expiry of the Fit Note, the employee is still put at a disadvantage, the employer has an ongoing duty to make reasonable adjustments but this should be judged by the circumstances at that particular time and cannot be guaranteed in advance as Mr Higgins was effectively requesting.

For further information and advice on duties to make reasonable adjustments that you may owe and the importance of following correct procedures in relation to this, please contact Helen Watson on 01244 405575 or send an email to [email protected].

You might also be interested in...

Fair pay for fair work? “Dividends” in owner-managed companies.

22nd May, 2019

There have been a number of Court decisions in recent years grappling with the application of established legal... Read More »

Defending or Bringing a potential Inheritance Act Claim

17th May, 2019

The recent judgement in Wellesley v Wellesley follows the developing line of claims brought by adult children who... Read More »

Shropshire’s leading ladies come together to celebrate business achievements

17th May, 2019

Businesswomen from across Shropshire have come together at an exclusive afternoon tea event held by law firm Aaron... Read More »

Contact Us