Close menu



Having trained and qualified at a top 100 law firm before joining Aaron & Partners, he has developed specific expertise in dealing with high value and complex claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) 1975 Act, as well as proprietary estoppel claims. He also acts for clients bringing or defending claims against estates, including challenges or defences to the validity of wills, and estate administration disputes.

He regularly advises trustees and beneficiaries in relation to trust related disputes, breaches of trust, claims pursuant to the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 as well as directions applications. He is also experienced in advising clients in respect of equitable claims, including resulting and constructive trust claims.

Vlad’s litigation experience has seen him resolving claims with and without the court’s assistance, for a wide range of clients, ranging from individuals, trust corporations and banks. He has successfully pursued claims in the High Court and Court of Appeal, as well as resolving matters utilising a wide variety of alternative dispute resolution methods, including mediation.

Vlad is a member of ACTAPS (The Association of Contentious Trusts and Probate Specialists).

Examples of cases in which Vlad has been involved include:

  • Acting for beneficiaries seeking to set aside a will believed to be invalid on the grounds of lack of testamentary capacity, lack of knowledge and approval and procured by means of undue influence
  • Representing the spouse and sole beneficiary of the deceased’s estate, worth in excess of £4.5m, to defend claims by the deceased’s daughters for reasonable financial provision under the Inheritance Act
  • Acting for deputies seeking to challenge the validity of a declaration of trust executed by the protected party on the grounds of presumed undue influence
  • Successfully reaching a settlement on behalf of the sole beneficiary of his father’s farming partnership and estate, following a claim by the deceased’s long term co-habiting partner
  • Acting for the co-executor and 50% beneficiary of an estate comprising of various farms and complex partnership issues
  • Advising trustees with regards to the removal and replacement of trustees
  • Assisting personal representatives to interpret various complex clauses in the deceased’s will and trust
  • Acting for an adult child in successfully settling a 1975 Act claim, achieving a significant increase to the inheritance due from her father’s £5m estate

Reported cases

Thompson v Raggett and others [2018] EWHC 688 (Ch)

Vlad successfully acted for the claimant, who secured an outright interest in a property, as well as lump sum payment and provision for her costs, totalling in excess of £414,000 from a £1.5m estate for the deceased’s long term partner and co-habitee. The High Court’s decision is significant given that the Supreme Court in Ilott v The Blue Cross [2017] 2 WLR 979 indicated that if housing is to be provided by way of maintenance, more likely than not, it will be provided by way of a life interest.

Davies & Davies v Davies [2016] EWCA Civ 463

Vlad assisted to secure the claimant an equitable interest in her parent’s farm, securing a lump sum payment, pursuant to the equitable doctrine of proprietary estoppel. The Court of Appeal’s decision provided clarity on the judicial approach to the interplay between expectation based, and detrimental reliance awards.


Legal 500 2021 Wales Contentious Trusts and Probate

  • “Vlad is a rising star in this field and works astonishingly hard for his clients, putting London competitors to shame”

Legal 500 2022 – North West – Contentious Trusts and Probate – listed as a “Rising Star”

  • “Vlad Macdonald-Munteanu is very on the ball and has first rate commercial instincts. Extremely good at assessing risk for clients.”

Chambers and Partners 2021 High Net Worth Private Wealth Disputes

  • “a very impressive solicitor whose work is always extremely thorough, and a very bright and personable chap”
  • “he has really good knowledge, he’s really sound”

Chambers and Partners 2022 High Net Worth Private Wealth Disputes – listed as an “Associate to Watch”

  • “Vlad Macdonald is really commercially astute” says a source, who also praises his “commercial but sensitive approach”

Vlad MacDonald-Munteanu has recently joined and is a real catch. Smart, tactically astute and very good with tricky clients, he is also brilliant at bringing work in’.
The Legal 500
During our dealings with Vlad Macdonald-Munteanu, he has shown himself to be competent and articulate, engaging fully with a wide range of complex issues. His advice is always helpful and coherent, enabling the client to arrive confidently at difficult decisions. Vlad is tenacious in pursuing appropriate legal action and displays the utmost professionalism in his work. His manner is totally supportive, with the constructive approach evidenced by him throughout our interactions, resulting in a n excellent conclusion for all concerned. His conscientious efforts have been much appreciated.
Vlad Macdonald-Munteanu dealt with our case. He was absolutely amazing. Extremely knowledgeable and without him or this firm I doubt we would have had the outcome we did.
The Legal 500
It was an extremely difficult time for my family when my father passed away. It was made ever more difficult when an estranged family member, who had been intentionally omitted from his will, sought legal action against myself and the other four beneficiaries. After a chance encounter with a friend, who happened to be a solicitor, she recommended that I contact Vlad at Aaron & Partners. I was at my most vulnerable and completely overwhelmed when I met Vlad, but he was a breath of fresh air. He was highly professional and supportive throughout the case, and I immediately felt like he was on our side, and that he had a real willing to get the best possible result. I cannot speak highly enough of the service I received from Vlad and the rest of the firm. I truly believe that if I had not been put in touch with Vlad, we would have had a very different outcome.