Clarity the Key in Contracts
18th January, 2010
Clarity in property contracts is crucial, as is illustrated by a recent decision of the Court of Appeal.
The case concerned a property deal in which planning permission had to be obtained. The contracts for such deals are often conditional on the granting of planning permission. In this case, however, the scenario was somewhat different. The buyer wished to turn the property being purchased into flats, which required the permission of a third party on account of a covenant on the property that existed because it was in a conservation area.
The vendor agreed to meet the cost of obtaining the release of the covenant, which was estimated not to exceed £12,000. The third party rather oddly refused to release the covenant until planning permission for the development had been received. The buyer decided to purchase the buildings (at a cost of £862,000) before planning permission was granted.
The way the contract was drafted was far from clear and it did not anticipate the actual circumstances. As a result, a term would have to be implied into it to deal with the position as it transpired in fact. The buyer claimed that it should receive a discount on the purchase price for the estimated cost of obtaining the release of the covenant. The vendor claimed that no discount was payable, on the basis that, at the time of sale, the covenant had not been released. In court, the judge did not support either interpretation of the contract, so the dispute wound up in the Court of Appeal. There, LJ Arden commented that, “If the agreement is susceptible of an interpretation which will make it enforceable and effective, the Court will prefer that interpretation to any interpretation which would result in its being void. The Court will also prefer an interpretation which produces a result which the parties are likely to have agreed over an improbable result.”
The Court concluded that the appropriate discount must be “an amount which is reasonably required for the purpose of obtaining a release or variation of the applicable restrictive covenants such as would enable the Development…to take place.”
What is slightly surprising is that this dispute ended up in the Court of Appeal at all, with both sides meeting their costs – likely to be several times the sum under dispute.
The more variables there are in a contract, the more important it is that it is clearly drafted.
For advice on all property and contract matters, contact Simon Ellis who also has particular expertise in charity land transactions and auctions on 01244 405516 or email him here.
You might also be interested in...
22nd May, 2018
With the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) coming into force in May, businesses across Shropshire have been flocking to hear more about the new laws Paul Bennett, a partner at law firm Aaron & Partners LLP, has been delivering seminars in partnership with the Shropshire Chamber of Commerce An employment solicitor from Shrewsbury is urging businesses across the... Read More »
15th May, 2018
Experienced HR leader joins Aaron & Partners LLP Law firm with offices in Chester and Shrewsbury appoints Kate Robertson to drive HR strategy for more than 120 staff and to support the company’s growth Chester law firm Aaron & Partners LLP has strengthened its senior leadership team with the appointment of an experienced human resources manager. Kate Robertson... Read More »
24th April, 2018
Jan Chillery, Insolvency Partner at Aaron & Partners LLP, shares her experience and the reasons why we should be cautious before paying so-called “bailiffs” over the phone or online without vetting them first. My neighbour has told me that recently he had a CCJ (County Court Judgment) against him. A day or so later, he received a phone call... Read More »