Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Manchester 0844 800 8346

Office Number 129
Manchester Business Park
3000 Aviator Way
Manchester M22 5TG

Send us a message
Our Offices

Confidential Information – Judge rules as “a warning to others”: Imprisonment for breach of court order

24th July, 2017

A former employee who breached an injunction has been imprisoned. By way of background, Mr Dadi was employed by the Claimant who was in the business of providing services to the aviation industry. The Claimant had brought proceedings against Mr Dadi (and others) seeking an injunction for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and/or breach of confidence in OCS Group UK Ltd v Dadi & Others [2017] EWHC 1727 (Ch).

An injunction was granted which prohibited Mr Dadi from disclosing confidential information belonging to the Claimant, required him to disclose what confidential information had been shared with third parties, prohibited him from disclosing the existence of the court order with anyone else and imposed obligations to preserve hard copy and electronic documents.

Mr Dadi committed four breaches of the court order before seeking legal advice including informing others about the restrictions and deleting a substantial number of emails from his email account.

Following the receipt of legal advice Mr Dadi took actions to rectify the breaches. He instructed his legal advisor to inform the court and the Claimant of those breaches, was cooperative with the Claimant in trying to retrieve the deleted emails and was apologetic for his conduct.

At the hearing the judge ruled;

“..a short sentence imprisonment of six weeks must be imposed on Mr Dadi to mark the court’s strong disapproval of his conduct and to act as a deterrence both in respect of his further compliance with the orders of the court and as a warning to others who might be tempted to flout the court’s orders in this manner.”

In reaching the sentencing decision the court took into account all of the mitigating factors and the hardship Mr Dadi’s family would experience if he were sent to prison. However, it highlights the importance of complying with court orders and demonstrates the court’s position should an order be breached.

If you are unsure of your duties to your employer, including regarding the duty of confidentiality and fiduciary duties, or if you have an employee who you believe is failing to comply with their duties, please contact our Employment Department for specialist advice.

Paul Bennett

Partner in Professional Practices and Employment Law
Email: [email protected]
Tel: 01743 453685

You might also be interested in...

Opening up the Market in the United Arab Emirates

10th September, 2018

This is the first in a series of  6 articles with regards to establishing a business in the... Read More »

What to do if you receive a statutory demand…

9th August, 2018

We have been approached by a number of clients who have received a statutory demand, either personally or to their company, and they have asked us what to do about it. One business was contacted by a company demanding payment of a debt owed under a contract for TV advertising in a shopping mall.  We presume – but... Read More »

Farming solicitor Ben Brassington joins top law firm in Shrewsbury

3rd August, 2018

Agriculture and Estates specialist Ben Brassington has strengthened the services offered by Top 200 legal firm Aaron & Partners LLP A dairy farmer with more than 18 years’ experience as a Partner in his family’s farming business has been appointed by a top legal firm in Shrewsbury. Ben Brassington, who has also been working for several years as... Read More »

Contact Us