Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Manchester 0844 800 8346

Pall Mall Court
61-67 King Street
Manchester M2 4PD

Send us a message
Our Offices

Landlords Win Deposit Case

22nd August, 2011

Provisions introduced on 6 April 2007 under the Housing Act 2004 made it a requirement that landlords protect their tenants’ deposits using an authorised Tenancy Deposit Scheme, if they have let the property on an assured shorthold tenancy. The rules require the landlord to notify the tenant within 14 days that this has been done. The Act set up a system of penalties for landlords that fail to meet this obligation.

Recently, however, the Court of Appeal has issued a ruling which will please landlords and dismay tenants. It involved a tenant who took legal action against his landlord because the landlord failed to lodge the tenant’s deposit with one of the authorised schemes.

By the time the action had been brought, the landlord had put the position right. The question before the court, therefore, was whether the tenant could bring an action given that the failure which led to the action had been rectified.

The court concluded, by a two to one majority, that the tenant could not. Where a landlord is late in taking steps to protect the deposit and in notifying the tenant within the 14-day time limit that this has been done, but does so before proceedings are brought by the tenant, the tenant has no cause of action against the landlord.

In practice, this means that a landlord who fails to comply with the law in this respect can do so with impunity up until the point at which proceedings are brought by the tenant. However, landlords tempted to use this ruling to avoid compliance should remember that they cannot obtain possession of the premises unless they have complied with their obligations under the Act.

Please contact Simon Ellis for any further information related to this article or any other commercial property issue at [email protected]

You might also be interested in...

Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance: Run-off and alternative regulators

18th July, 2018

Special Focus: Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance Run-off – it dominates the thoughts of sole practitioners and partners in smaller law firms in my experience and restricts the ambitions of firms. The SRA could help law firms by relaxing their rules on run-off cover on their Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance to help firms merge or close more easily. This would protect... Read More »

Senior employment lawyer joins Theatr Clwyd board

17th July, 2018

Helen Watson, Head of Employment Law at Aaron & Partners LLP, has taken up an invitation to become a Trustee of both the Trust Board and the Main Board Theatr Clwyd has bolstered its senior leadership team with the appointment of an experienced employment law solicitor to support its vision of being at the forefront of theatre making... Read More »

Why there is more to CSR than just boosting a company’s ego

6th July, 2018

When a business invests in its community it deserves praise – but it must go beyond that, writes Helen Watson, a trustee at Claire House and partner at Aaron and Partners Solicitors. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the link between a company and the community in which it operates. As a trustee on charity boards including Claire House... Read More »

Contact Us