Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Airport City, Manchester 0844 800 8346

Office 129
Manchester Business Park
3000 Aviator Way
Manchester M22 5TG

Send us a message
Our Offices

No Compensation for Consequential Losses

15th January, 2014

Cases arising from the damage done by rioters during the 2011 riots are now beginning to come to court.

Recently, one such case was decided concerning the extent of the losses covered by the Riot (Damages) Act 1886. The Act provides that compensation will be due where there is damage to a building or its contents by ‘persons riotously and tumultuously assembled together’. In such cases, compensation is paid by the Government.

It was straightforward for the insurers (who otherwise stood to pick up the bill for their policyholders’ claims) to show that the damage was the result of a group of youths which met the definition, as the rioters had looted and burned the property concerned. A claim for more than £49 million was made.

However, the more contentious issue for the claimant insurance companies related to the extent to which they could claim compensation for the policyholders’ loss of profits and rent subsequent to the loss and damage caused directly. Nearly another £4 million was at stake.

The High Court ruled that the companies’ claims were limited to the physical damage to the premises and the property in it. The statute did not cover consequential losses of profit or rent.

Whether this will lead to a hardening of commercial insurance policy rates or wider exclusion clauses remains to be seen, but it is yet another good reason to make sure you fully understand all the clauses in your insurance policies and take advice as needed.

We can advise you on any property-related matter, including the legal effect of clauses in your insurance policies.

For more information please contact Giles Williams on 01244 405578 or email [email protected]

 

You might also be interested in...

Villiers v Villiers (2018) EWCA Civ 1120

3rd July, 2020

Brief Background Mr & Mrs Villier married in 1995, and lived in Scotland together until separation in 2012. Once separated, the wife moved to England, but the husband remained living in Scotland. In July 2013 the wife issued a divorce petition in England, but in October 2014 the husband lodged a writ for divorce in Scotland. As the... Read More »

Why claiming inheritance tax relief is not simply horseplay

1st July, 2020

Agricultural property relief from Inheritance Tax has long been a valuable relief for estates, which when available can... Read More »

Governments Calls For Responsible Contractual Behaviour – What Does This Mean For You?

29th June, 2020

In May 2020 the UK Government released additional guidance in connection with the Covid-19 pandemic, this time in... Read More »

Contact Us
Secured By miniOrange