Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Manchester 0844 800 8346

Pall Mall Court
61-67 King Street
Manchester M2 4PD

Send us a message
Our Offices

Post-employment victimisation

29th February, 2012

It has recently been held by an employment tribunal in Jessemey v Rowstock Ltd and another that post-employment victimisation is not unlawful under the Equality Act 2010 (the Act).

Whilst section 108 of the Act does protect against post-employment discrimination and harassment, it does not expressly protect against post-employment victimisation.  Section 108(7) of the Act goes as far as to state that conduct amounting to victimisation will be dealt under the victimisation provisions and not the post-employment section.  The victimisation provisions in the Act deal expressly with victimisation against current employees.

Jessemey involved an employee that brought a claim against his employer for age discrimination and unfair dismissal after being dismissed.  The employer provided an unfavourable reference for the employee and as a result the employee pursued a further claim against his employer for victimisation.

The employment tribunal accepted that there had been an act of victimisation since the unfavourable reference was provided because the employee had brought tribunal proceedings against it.  However, the tribunal held that the claim could not succeed because section 108 of the Act does not prohibit post-employment victimisation, only post-employment discrimination and harassment.

Employees wishing to bring post-victimisation claims might seek to rely on Rhys-Harper v Relaxion Group plc; D’Souza v London Borough of Lambeth; Jones v 3M Healthcare Ltd. In that case, the House of Lords held that the pre-Equality Act 2010 legislation covered post-employment discrimination (including victimisation) even though the legislation at that time did not expressly protect former employees.

The employee in Jessemey does not appear to have relied on Rhys-Harper so it remains to be seen what the outcome will be if and when that decision is taken into account.

If you need advice or have any concerns regarding victimisation both during and after employment, please contact Helen Kidd in the Employment Team.

 

You might also be interested in...

Legal expert’s data protection workshops pull in the crowds

22nd May, 2018

With the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) coming into force in May, businesses across Shropshire have been flocking to hear more about the new laws Paul Bennett, a partner at law firm Aaron & Partners LLP, has been delivering seminars in partnership with the Shropshire Chamber of Commerce An employment solicitor from Shrewsbury is urging businesses across the... Read More »

Experienced HR leader joins Aaron & Partners LLP

15th May, 2018

Experienced HR leader joins Aaron & Partners LLP Law firm with offices in Chester and Shrewsbury appoints Kate Robertson to drive HR strategy for more than 120 staff and to support the company’s growth Chester law firm Aaron & Partners LLP has strengthened its senior leadership team with the appointment of an experienced human resources manager. Kate Robertson... Read More »

When you should NOT pay the bailiff…

24th April, 2018

Jan Chillery, Insolvency Partner at Aaron & Partners LLP, shares her experience and the reasons why we should be cautious before paying so-called “bailiffs” over the phone or online without vetting them first. My neighbour has told me that recently he had a CCJ (County Court Judgment) against him. A day or so later, he received a phone call... Read More »

Contact Us