Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Airport City, Manchester 0844 800 8346

Office 129
Manchester Business Park
3000 Aviator Way
Manchester M22 5TG

Send us a message
Our Offices

Employment status: Are actors workers?

7th November, 2014

The recent case of MacAlinden v Lazarov and others UKEAT0453/13 raised the question as to whether actors working under a profit share agreement were ‘workers’ for the purposes of employment legislation and therefore eligible to make a claim to the Employment Tribunal.

In this case, five actors were appearing in a play under an “actor’s contract”. They were remunerated only by way of a share in the play’s profits. Whilst the play was critically acclaimed, it unfortunately did not make any profit, meaning that the five actors received no financial reward for their roles.

Once the play had closed, the five actors made Employment Tribunal claims pursuant to national minimum wage legislation and claimed that they were owed holiday pay. These claims only had prospects of success if the actors were deemed to be workers (for the purposes of employment legislation).

The Employment Tribunal Judge held that the actors were indeed workers, as he considered that they were required to undertake the work personally and that there had been a sufficient degree of mutuality of obligation.

The Respondent appealed this decision on the basis that the Employment Tribunal Judge had not properly considered whether the actors were carrying out a profession or a business undertaking where the other party to the contract was a client or a customer. The Respondent’s reasoning fulfilled the exception to the worker definition.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal agreed with the Respondent’s contention on the basis of witness evidence showing that the individual actors were marketing themselves for their own career development rather than holding themselves out to be an integral part of a joint operation.

The matter has been remitted to a fresh Tribunal and we will await the decision.

For further information and advice in relation to employment status, please contact Claire Brook on 01244 405575 or send an email to Clai[email protected].

You might also be interested in...

Villiers v Villiers (2018) EWCA Civ 1120

3rd July, 2020

Brief Background Mr & Mrs Villier married in 1995, and lived in Scotland together until separation in 2012. Once separated, the wife moved to England, but the husband remained living in Scotland. In July 2013 the wife issued a divorce petition in England, but in October 2014 the husband lodged a writ for divorce in Scotland. As the... Read More »

Why claiming inheritance tax relief is not simply horseplay

1st July, 2020

Agricultural property relief from Inheritance Tax has long been a valuable relief for estates, which when available can... Read More »

Governments Calls For Responsible Contractual Behaviour – What Does This Mean For You?

29th June, 2020

In May 2020 the UK Government released additional guidance in connection with the Covid-19 pandemic, this time in... Read More »

Contact Us
Secured By miniOrange