Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Manchester 0844 800 8346

Pall Mall Court
61-67 King Street
Manchester M2 4PD

Send us a message
Our Offices

Last Orders

29th June, 2012

In LOM Management Ltd v Sweeny [2010] UKEATS/0058/11/BI, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (“the EAT”) held that the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (“TUPE”) did not apply to an assignment of a lease and so an employee was not dismissed unfairly by the new tenant of the lease.

Miss Sweeny worked as a Duty Manager for her father at a bar of which he was a tenant.  The tenancy was assigned to LOM Management Ltd (“LOM”) whilst Miss Sweeny was on holiday and on her return Miss Sweeny discovered that she did not have a job.  She brought a claim against LOM that she had been unfairly dismissed by reason of a business transfer to which TUPE applied.

The Employment Tribunal in Glasgow held that TUPE did apply to the transfer between Miss Sweeny’s father and LOM since there had been an assignment of a lease of commercial premises and that the reason for Miss Sweeny’s dismissal was the transfer.  It therefore held that Miss Sweeny had been unfairly dismissed.

On appeal, the EAT disagreed with the Employment Tribunal.  It stated that although a TUPE transfer can apply to an assignment of a lease, it requires the existence of an economic entity before the assignment which retained its identity after the assignment.  An economic entity is defined in TUPE as “an organised grouping of resources which has the objective of pursuing an economic activity, whether or nor the activity is central or ancillary”.

The EAT held that the Employment Tribunal could not have concluded that there was an economic entity or that it transferred to LOM.  It held that Miss Sweeny failed to discharge the burden on her to establish that TUPE did apply and therefore upheld LOM’s appeal and dismissed Miss Sweeny’s claim.

Although in Miss Sweeny’s case TUPE did not apply on an assignment of a lease of a commercial property, it may apply if there is a business which also transfers satisfying the definition of an economic entity.

If you are currently transferring, or considering transferring, a business under TUPE, please do not hesitate to contact Helen Kidd in the Employment team with any queries at [email protected] or on 01244 405537.

 

You might also be interested in...

Legal expert’s data protection workshops pull in the crowds

22nd May, 2018

With the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) coming into force in May, businesses across Shropshire have been flocking to hear more about the new laws Paul Bennett, a partner at law firm Aaron & Partners LLP, has been delivering seminars in partnership with the Shropshire Chamber of Commerce An employment solicitor from Shrewsbury is urging businesses across the... Read More »

Experienced HR leader joins Aaron & Partners LLP

15th May, 2018

Experienced HR leader joins Aaron & Partners LLP Law firm with offices in Chester and Shrewsbury appoints Kate Robertson to drive HR strategy for more than 120 staff and to support the company’s growth Chester law firm Aaron & Partners LLP has strengthened its senior leadership team with the appointment of an experienced human resources manager. Kate Robertson... Read More »

When you should NOT pay the bailiff…

24th April, 2018

Jan Chillery, Insolvency Partner at Aaron & Partners LLP, shares her experience and the reasons why we should be cautious before paying so-called “bailiffs” over the phone or online without vetting them first. My neighbour has told me that recently he had a CCJ (County Court Judgment) against him. A day or so later, he received a phone call... Read More »

Contact Us