Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Manchester 0844 800 8346

Pall Mall Court
61-67 King Street
Manchester M2 4PD

Send us a message
Our Offices

Misrepresentation Leaves Burgled Company Uninsured

26th May, 2010

Theft of goods by burglars from a secured cage in a warehouse may seem to be a straightforward matter as far as making an insurance claim goes, but a recent case shows otherwise.

The insured held goods including cigarettes and tobacco and had a standard commercial risks policy which covered losses due to theft. The high-value goods were stored in a cage inside the general warehouse on an upper floor.

When burglars stole them, the company claimed on its policy and the insurer refused to settle the claim.

Firstly, the insurer claimed that the company had failed to carry out the necessary maintenance of the security equipment and alarm which was required under the policy.

In the view of the court, such a clause was only breached if the insured became aware of defects and then failed to put them right or was reckless as to whether there were defects or not. Otherwise, the requirement that defects be rectified promptly would absolve the insurer from liability in almost all such cases.

However, the insurance policy also contained a stipulation that the theft of cigarettes and tobacco outside business hours would not be covered unless these were kept securely and on the ground floor. The stipulation had been lifted once the insurers had received assurances from the insured that necessary improvements to the security arrangements had been made. Here, however, the company had made a material misrepresentation. The goods were still stored on the upper floor. Accordingly, the insurers were entitled to rescind the variation to the original policy with the result that the theft was not insured. This demonstrates the importance of checking the terms of your insurance and if in practice you do not operate in accordance with those terms either change your practices or tell the insurer the truth. This may involve a higher premium but that is better than not being insured at all.

Says Nick Clarke “Insurers are never keen to pay out on policies and it is important to have a thorough understanding of the terms of your policy.”

For this, or any other contractual matter, please contact Nick Clarke on 01244 405508 or email him here.

You might also be interested in...

Legal expert’s data protection workshops pull in the crowds

22nd May, 2018

With the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) coming into force in May, businesses across Shropshire have been flocking to hear more about the new laws Paul Bennett, a partner at law firm Aaron & Partners LLP, has been delivering seminars in partnership with the Shropshire Chamber of Commerce An employment solicitor from Shrewsbury is urging businesses across the... Read More »

Experienced HR leader joins Aaron & Partners LLP

15th May, 2018

Experienced HR leader joins Aaron & Partners LLP Law firm with offices in Chester and Shrewsbury appoints Kate Robertson to drive HR strategy for more than 120 staff and to support the company’s growth Chester law firm Aaron & Partners LLP has strengthened its senior leadership team with the appointment of an experienced human resources manager. Kate Robertson... Read More »

When you should NOT pay the bailiff…

24th April, 2018

Jan Chillery, Insolvency Partner at Aaron & Partners LLP, shares her experience and the reasons why we should be cautious before paying so-called “bailiffs” over the phone or online without vetting them first. My neighbour has told me that recently he had a CCJ (County Court Judgment) against him. A day or so later, he received a phone call... Read More »

Contact Us