Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Manchester 0844 800 8346

Pall Mall Court
61-67 King Street
Manchester M2 4PD

Send us a message
Our Offices

Misrepresentation Leaves Burgled Company Uninsured

26th May, 2010

Theft of goods by burglars from a secured cage in a warehouse may seem to be a straightforward matter as far as making an insurance claim goes, but a recent case shows otherwise.

The insured held goods including cigarettes and tobacco and had a standard commercial risks policy which covered losses due to theft. The high-value goods were stored in a cage inside the general warehouse on an upper floor.

When burglars stole them, the company claimed on its policy and the insurer refused to settle the claim.

Firstly, the insurer claimed that the company had failed to carry out the necessary maintenance of the security equipment and alarm which was required under the policy.

In the view of the court, such a clause was only breached if the insured became aware of defects and then failed to put them right or was reckless as to whether there were defects or not. Otherwise, the requirement that defects be rectified promptly would absolve the insurer from liability in almost all such cases.

However, the insurance policy also contained a stipulation that the theft of cigarettes and tobacco outside business hours would not be covered unless these were kept securely and on the ground floor. The stipulation had been lifted once the insurers had received assurances from the insured that necessary improvements to the security arrangements had been made. Here, however, the company had made a material misrepresentation. The goods were still stored on the upper floor. Accordingly, the insurers were entitled to rescind the variation to the original policy with the result that the theft was not insured. This demonstrates the importance of checking the terms of your insurance and if in practice you do not operate in accordance with those terms either change your practices or tell the insurer the truth. This may involve a higher premium but that is better than not being insured at all.

Says Nick Clarke “Insurers are never keen to pay out on policies and it is important to have a thorough understanding of the terms of your policy.”

For this, or any other contractual matter, please contact Nick Clarke on 01244 405508 or email him here.

You might also be interested in...

Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance: Run-off and alternative regulators

18th July, 2018

Special Focus: Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance Run-off – it dominates the thoughts of sole practitioners and partners in smaller law firms in my experience and restricts the ambitions of firms. The SRA could help law firms by relaxing their rules on run-off cover on their Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance to help firms merge or close more easily. This would protect... Read More »

Senior employment lawyer joins Theatr Clwyd board

17th July, 2018

Helen Watson, Head of Employment Law at Aaron & Partners LLP, has taken up an invitation to become a Trustee of both the Trust Board and the Main Board Theatr Clwyd has bolstered its senior leadership team with the appointment of an experienced employment law solicitor to support its vision of being at the forefront of theatre making... Read More »

Why there is more to CSR than just boosting a company’s ego

6th July, 2018

When a business invests in its community it deserves praise – but it must go beyond that, writes Helen Watson, a trustee at Claire House and partner at Aaron and Partners Solicitors. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the link between a company and the community in which it operates. As a trustee on charity boards including Claire House... Read More »

Contact Us