M&S apologises to customers refused sale due to religious beliefs of employee
10th February, 2014
M&S has been forced to apologise to its customers following substantial criticism on an employee’s refusal to sell alcohol and pork products due to religious beliefs.
In a Central London branch of M&S, a customer reportedly tried to buy a bottle of Champagne but was told by the checkout assistant that they would need to use another till and that, in apologising, she could not serve the customer.
Soon after the reporting, M&S were hounded with backlash via several Facebook pages, including one named “Boycott Marks and Spencer”, as well as TV and radio broadcasts commenting on the matter.
M&S state that they have a policy in place whereby an employee can be placed in a different department if their religious beliefs restrict food or drink they can handle. They admitted and apologised that in this case, they hadn’t acted in accordance with their own policies, leaving the Muslim employee in the food department to refuse sale to the customer.
M&S’ apology hasn’t washed with disgruntled customers, who have categorised the policy as “ridiculous” and “PC gone mad”. Further, leaders of Asda and John Lewis have confirmed that they have no such policy in place and that M&S’ approach was “one stage beyond common sense”. Although they did recognise that if a similar issue arose with one of their employees, they would deal with it on a case by case basis, they questioned whether members of staff should have the right to refuse to serve customers in any event.
Perhaps more worryingly, the case has raised the question of how far this issue really could go. Via the Facebook page, one customer questioned whether an atheist worker will refuse the sale of hot cross buns at Easter and said that M&S had created “division and hatred within our communities”. Further, theoretically, a Muslim worker could refuse the sale of any meat products or items such as desserts containing small amounts of alcohol, surely this is a step too far.
The key employment law issue raised here is the failure by M&S to have robust policies in place which they abide by. Further, it is possible that M&S didn’t provide training to employees in relation to the policy and as such the checkout assistant was left to handle products against her religious beliefs, when in fact the policy allowed her to work in a different department.
For a free review of your existing policies, or advice on implementing policies and providing training to employees, please contact Claire Brook on 01244 405575 or send and email to [email protected].
You might also be interested in...
18th July, 2018
Special Focus: Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance Run-off – it dominates the thoughts of sole practitioners and partners in smaller law firms in my experience and restricts the ambitions of firms. The SRA could help law firms by relaxing their rules on run-off cover on their Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance to help firms merge or close more easily. This would protect... Read More »
17th July, 2018
Helen Watson, Head of Employment Law at Aaron & Partners LLP, has taken up an invitation to become a Trustee of both the Trust Board and the Main Board Theatr Clwyd has bolstered its senior leadership team with the appointment of an experienced employment law solicitor to support its vision of being at the forefront of theatre making... Read More »
6th July, 2018
When a business invests in its community it deserves praise – but it must go beyond that, writes Helen Watson, a trustee at Claire House and partner at Aaron and Partners Solicitors. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the link between a company and the community in which it operates. As a trustee on charity boards including Claire House... Read More »