Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Manchester 0844 800 8346

Pall Mall Court
61-67 King Street
Manchester M2 4PD

Send us a message
Our Offices

Who is responsible for conducting a teacher’s disciplinary proceedings?

6th November, 2014

In the case of Davies v Haringey LBC [2014] EWHC 3393 (QB) it was held that a teacher may be disciplined by a local authority, rather than her employing school itself, particularly where the teacher’s duties had been distanced from the school for a considerable length of time.

The Claimant was technically employed by the Respondent local authority, but employed specifically to work at a community school within the area. The Claimant remained in her teaching role at the school for eight years, before being elected as an NUT official. The Claimant’s role as an NUT official continued full time for 14 years, albeit during this time she was still paid as a teacher of the school.

The Claimant was suspended for alleged breaches of the local authority’s Code of Conduct and disciplinary proceedings were initiated.

The Claimant asked the High Court to find that she could only be disciplined by the Governors of the school where she was a teacher. The local authority relied on the fact that the Claimant was actually employed by them and could therefore be disciplined by them (as well as the school).

It was held that whilst the Governors did have disciplinary powers over staff at their school, in this case, the Claimant had not realistically worked at the school for 14 years. The local authority therefore also held disciplinary powers over her and could initiate the proceedings itself.

For further information and advice in relation to disciplinary proceedings, please contact Helen Watson on 01244 405565 or send an email to [email protected].

You might also be interested in...

Why there is more to CSR than just boosting a company’s ego

6th July, 2018

When a business invests in its community it deserves praise – but it must go beyond that, writes Helen Watson, a trustee at Claire House and partner at Aaron and Partners Solicitors. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the link between a company and the community in which it operates. As a trustee on charity boards including Claire House... Read More »

Stuart Haynes reports on IAG Global – Wiesbaden 14th to 17th June 2018

4th July, 2018

Stuart Haynes, Corporate & Commercial Partner and IAG Global Board Member, reports on IAG Global – Wiesbaden held 14th to 17th June 2018 Stuart Haynes (IAG Global Board Member) Stuart Scott-Goldstone and Nick Clarke attended the recent IAG Global meeting in Wiesbaden which was held at the Grand Hotel Nassauer Hof from 14th – and 17th July 2018 The meeting... Read More »

DNA Test ordered in inheritance dispute where paternity questioned

6th June, 2018

Rhiannon Edwards, Solicitor in the Wills, Trusts and Tax department, discusses the recent judgement in the case of Nield-Moir v Freeman, where the High Court has ordered one of two daughters of Colin Birtles, who has died, to take a DNA test to prove paternity as part of an inheritance dispute In an unusual case, the High Court... Read More »

Contact Us