Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Manchester 0844 800 8346

Pall Mall Court
61-67 King Street
Manchester M2 4PD

Send us a message
Our Offices

Are you the best person for the job?

28th March, 2012

The case of Samsung Electronics v Monte-D’Cruz has determined that once an employee is dismissed by reason of redundancy he or she does not need to be appointed in a new role arising out of the re-organisation if they are “in reality the best person for the job”.

The Claimant was working as a head of department for Samsung.  He, along with the other two heads of department, were informed that due to a re-structure, their roles would be removed and a single role would be created.  The Claimant applied for this role.  He was assessed on the basis of a presentation and competencies commonly used in annual appraisals but was unsuccessful.  He then applied for a more junior role but an external candidate was appointed instead.

The judgement handed down on 1 March 2012 by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (“EAT”) reversed the decision of the tribunal, which had found the dismissal of the Claimant was unfair due to inadequate consultation and the selection criteria being too subjective.  The EAT held the tribunal was wrong to substitute its own view for that of the employer in relation to the suitability of the Claimant for the role.  Although the interview process should be judged on its objectivity, it was said some subjectivity was inevitable, even though “subjectivity is often used in this and similar contexts as a dirty word”.

This stance reiterates the EAT’s position last year in Morgan v Welsh Rugby Union where it was stated “an employer’s assessment of which candidate will best perform in a new role is likely to involve a substantial element of judgement”.  As highlighted in the conclusion of Samsung, a recruitment process may be flawed, but will not mean an employee will be able to complain that their dismissal is unfair where they are simply “the victim of a genuine redundancy situation”.

If you have any questions regarding redundancy or any other employment matters email Claire Brook in our Employment Team or call 01244 405575.

You might also be interested in...

Legal expert’s data protection workshops pull in the crowds

22nd May, 2018

With the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) coming into force in May, businesses across Shropshire have been flocking to hear more about the new laws Paul Bennett, a partner at law firm Aaron & Partners LLP, has been delivering seminars in partnership with the Shropshire Chamber of Commerce An employment solicitor from Shrewsbury is urging businesses across the... Read More »

Experienced HR leader joins Aaron & Partners LLP

15th May, 2018

Experienced HR leader joins Aaron & Partners LLP Law firm with offices in Chester and Shrewsbury appoints Kate Robertson to drive HR strategy for more than 120 staff and to support the company’s growth Chester law firm Aaron & Partners LLP has strengthened its senior leadership team with the appointment of an experienced human resources manager. Kate Robertson... Read More »

When you should NOT pay the bailiff…

24th April, 2018

Jan Chillery, Insolvency Partner at Aaron & Partners LLP, shares her experience and the reasons why we should be cautious before paying so-called “bailiffs” over the phone or online without vetting them first. My neighbour has told me that recently he had a CCJ (County Court Judgment) against him. A day or so later, he received a phone call... Read More »

Contact Us