Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Airport City, Manchester 0844 800 8346

Office 129
Manchester Business Park
3000 Aviator Way
Manchester M22 5TG

Send us a message
Our Offices

Are you the best person for the job?

28th March, 2012

The case of Samsung Electronics v Monte-D’Cruz has determined that once an employee is dismissed by reason of redundancy he or she does not need to be appointed in a new role arising out of the re-organisation if they are “in reality the best person for the job”.

The Claimant was working as a head of department for Samsung.  He, along with the other two heads of department, were informed that due to a re-structure, their roles would be removed and a single role would be created.  The Claimant applied for this role.  He was assessed on the basis of a presentation and competencies commonly used in annual appraisals but was unsuccessful.  He then applied for a more junior role but an external candidate was appointed instead.

The judgement handed down on 1 March 2012 by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (“EAT”) reversed the decision of the tribunal, which had found the dismissal of the Claimant was unfair due to inadequate consultation and the selection criteria being too subjective.  The EAT held the tribunal was wrong to substitute its own view for that of the employer in relation to the suitability of the Claimant for the role.  Although the interview process should be judged on its objectivity, it was said some subjectivity was inevitable, even though “subjectivity is often used in this and similar contexts as a dirty word”.

This stance reiterates the EAT’s position last year in Morgan v Welsh Rugby Union where it was stated “an employer’s assessment of which candidate will best perform in a new role is likely to involve a substantial element of judgement”.  As highlighted in the conclusion of Samsung, a recruitment process may be flawed, but will not mean an employee will be able to complain that their dismissal is unfair where they are simply “the victim of a genuine redundancy situation”.

If you have any questions regarding redundancy or any other employment matters email Claire Brook in our Employment Team or call 01244 405575.

You might also be interested in...

Ethics Guidance – Transparency in Price and Service

16th November, 2018

It is reported that a quarter of all complaints dealt with by the Legal Ombudsman revolve around costs therefore to avoid complaints and confusion, it is important to be clear from the outset. The new Transparency Rules (which the SRA have now confirmed will come into effect on 6 December 2018) require that accurate and relevant information is... Read More »

Aaron & Partners Increases Recommendations in Leading Industry Guide, The Legal 500

5th November, 2018

Aaron & Partners LLP has once again seen improved rankings in The Legal 500 – a comprehensive guide... Read More »

Mental Health and Stress in the Workplace – 3/3

10th October, 2018

In the lead up to World Mental Health Day on 10 October 2018, we have been posting a series of short articles discussing mental health and stress in the workplace. In this final article, we will be providing tips, to employers and employees, for managing stress and dealing with mental ill health in the workplace. Click here to... Read More »

Contact Us