Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Manchester 0844 800 8346

Pall Mall Court
61-67 King Street
Manchester M2 4PD

Send us a message
Our Offices

Are you the best person for the job?

28th March, 2012

The case of Samsung Electronics v Monte-D’Cruz has determined that once an employee is dismissed by reason of redundancy he or she does not need to be appointed in a new role arising out of the re-organisation if they are “in reality the best person for the job”.

The Claimant was working as a head of department for Samsung.  He, along with the other two heads of department, were informed that due to a re-structure, their roles would be removed and a single role would be created.  The Claimant applied for this role.  He was assessed on the basis of a presentation and competencies commonly used in annual appraisals but was unsuccessful.  He then applied for a more junior role but an external candidate was appointed instead.

The judgement handed down on 1 March 2012 by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (“EAT”) reversed the decision of the tribunal, which had found the dismissal of the Claimant was unfair due to inadequate consultation and the selection criteria being too subjective.  The EAT held the tribunal was wrong to substitute its own view for that of the employer in relation to the suitability of the Claimant for the role.  Although the interview process should be judged on its objectivity, it was said some subjectivity was inevitable, even though “subjectivity is often used in this and similar contexts as a dirty word”.

This stance reiterates the EAT’s position last year in Morgan v Welsh Rugby Union where it was stated “an employer’s assessment of which candidate will best perform in a new role is likely to involve a substantial element of judgement”.  As highlighted in the conclusion of Samsung, a recruitment process may be flawed, but will not mean an employee will be able to complain that their dismissal is unfair where they are simply “the victim of a genuine redundancy situation”.

If you have any questions regarding redundancy or any other employment matters email Claire Brook in our Employment Team or call 01244 405575.

You might also be interested in...

Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance: Run-off and alternative regulators

18th July, 2018

Special Focus: Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance Run-off – it dominates the thoughts of sole practitioners and partners in smaller law firms in my experience and restricts the ambitions of firms. The SRA could help law firms by relaxing their rules on run-off cover on their Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance to help firms merge or close more easily. This would protect... Read More »

Senior employment lawyer joins Theatr Clwyd board

17th July, 2018

Helen Watson, Head of Employment Law at Aaron & Partners LLP, has taken up an invitation to become a Trustee of both the Trust Board and the Main Board Theatr Clwyd has bolstered its senior leadership team with the appointment of an experienced employment law solicitor to support its vision of being at the forefront of theatre making... Read More »

Why there is more to CSR than just boosting a company’s ego

6th July, 2018

When a business invests in its community it deserves praise – but it must go beyond that, writes Helen Watson, a trustee at Claire House and partner at Aaron and Partners Solicitors. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the link between a company and the community in which it operates. As a trustee on charity boards including Claire House... Read More »

Contact Us