Guarantee Follows Contract, Says High Court
22nd December, 2011
Much trade is multinational and it is normal for contracts to specify the legal jurisdiction under which any dispute will be resolved. EU legislation has ‘tie breakers’ to ascertain the applicable law when the contract fails to specify this clearly.
In a recent case, the question arose of what law would apply when a guarantee in relation to a contract was in dispute. The contract specified that English law should apply to it, but the guarantee was silent regarding the applicable law. The parties involved were companies registered in the Cayman Islands and Russia respectively.
The Cayman Islands company argued that English law should apply to the guarantee and the Russian company that the EU rules should determine the appropriate jurisdiction.
The High Court was swift to conclude that if the main contract specified that English law should apply to it then, by inference, English law should apply to the guarantee also.
For advice on all contractual matters please contact Nick Clarke in the Corporate and Commercial Department.
You might also be interested in...
22nd May, 2019
There have been a number of Court decisions in recent years grappling with the application of established legal... Read More »
17th May, 2019
The recent judgement in Wellesley v Wellesley follows the developing line of claims brought by adult children who... Read More »
17th May, 2019
Businesswomen from across Shropshire have come together at an exclusive afternoon tea event held by law firm Aaron... Read More »