Guarantee Follows Contract, Says High Court
22nd December, 2011
Much trade is multinational and it is normal for contracts to specify the legal jurisdiction under which any dispute will be resolved. EU legislation has ‘tie breakers’ to ascertain the applicable law when the contract fails to specify this clearly.
In a recent case, the question arose of what law would apply when a guarantee in relation to a contract was in dispute. The contract specified that English law should apply to it, but the guarantee was silent regarding the applicable law. The parties involved were companies registered in the Cayman Islands and Russia respectively.
The Cayman Islands company argued that English law should apply to the guarantee and the Russian company that the EU rules should determine the appropriate jurisdiction.
The High Court was swift to conclude that if the main contract specified that English law should apply to it then, by inference, English law should apply to the guarantee also.
For advice on all contractual matters please contact Nick Clarke in the Corporate and Commercial Department.
You might also be interested in...
16th November, 2018
It is reported that a quarter of all complaints dealt with by the Legal Ombudsman revolve around costs. Therefore to avoid complaints and confusion, it is important to be clear from the outset. The new Transparency Rules (which the SRA have now confirmed will come into effect on 6 December 2018) require that accurate and relevant information is... Read More »
5th November, 2018
Aaron & Partners LLP has once again seen improved rankings in The Legal 500 – a comprehensive guide... Read More »
10th October, 2018
In the lead up to World Mental Health Day on 10 October 2018, we have been posting a series of short articles discussing mental health and stress in the workplace. In this final article, we will be providing tips, to employers and employees, for managing stress and dealing with mental ill health in the workplace. Click here to... Read More »