Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Manchester 0844 800 8346

Pall Mall Court
61-67 King Street
Manchester M2 4PD

Send us a message
Our Offices

Social Media

4th November, 2011

Whether through tweeting, blogging or other means – 22.7% of time online is spent on social networking (UKOM). That’s more than three times the second most time consuming online activity which is e-mailing at only 7.2% (UKOM). If so much time is spent on social networking it is inevitable that cases in Employment law involving social media activities will increase dramatically in the next few months.

One difficult question in this area is: where does an individual’s obligation to his employer end and his private life begin? In Pay v United Kingdom [2009] IRLR 139, an employee was dismissed after photographs of him participating in sado-masochistic activities were posted on the internet. In this particular case, given the nature of his role as a probation officer dealing with sexual offenders, interference to his private life under the European Convention on Human Rights was held to be proportionate by the European Court of Human Rights.

In Whitham v Club 24 Ltd t/a Ventura ET/1810462/10 an employee who posted comments suggesting that her colleagues were immature was unfairly dismissed since the comments were relatively mild and there were no specific references to any clients. Nor was there evidence of any actual or likely harm to the relationship between the Respondent and a client, Volkswagen.

In Preece v JD Wetherspoons plc ET2104806110 an employee was held to have been fairly dismissed after she made comments on her Facebook account whilst at work about customers who had been abusive to her and another employee. Miss Preece’s contract included a term that Wetherspoons could immediately terminate her contract if she was found guilty of gross misconduct. Examples of gross misconduct included failure to comply with the e-mail, internet and intranet policy.

There are relatively few reported cases on the topic of social media as of yet and few potential issues have been considered by the appeal courts. Until further guidance is available, employers should consider implementing a policy to deal with social media. The policy should cover the following:
– scope of the policy i.e. what is permitted and what is restricted;
– reserve the right to monitor and review IT resources;
– personal use of social media;
– reference to bullying, disciplinary, data protection and other related policies;
– consequences of breaching the policy.

For a social media policy or any other general queries, please contact Helen Watson on 01244 405555 or email [email protected].

You might also be interested in...

Legal expert’s data protection workshops pull in the crowds

22nd May, 2018

With the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) coming into force in May, businesses across Shropshire have been flocking to hear more about the new laws Paul Bennett, a partner at law firm Aaron & Partners LLP, has been delivering seminars in partnership with the Shropshire Chamber of Commerce An employment solicitor from Shrewsbury is urging businesses across the... Read More »

Experienced HR leader joins Aaron & Partners LLP

15th May, 2018

Experienced HR leader joins Aaron & Partners LLP Law firm with offices in Chester and Shrewsbury appoints Kate Robertson to drive HR strategy for more than 120 staff and to support the company’s growth Chester law firm Aaron & Partners LLP has strengthened its senior leadership team with the appointment of an experienced human resources manager. Kate Robertson... Read More »

When you should NOT pay the bailiff…

24th April, 2018

Jan Chillery, Insolvency Partner at Aaron & Partners LLP, shares her experience and the reasons why we should be cautious before paying so-called “bailiffs” over the phone or online without vetting them first. My neighbour has told me that recently he had a CCJ (County Court Judgment) against him. A day or so later, he received a phone call... Read More »

Contact Us