Virtual Assignment is not Assignment
27th May, 2010
A ‘virtual assignment’ is a device by which a tenant effectively appoints another organisation to deal with the practical aspects of its tenancy, in effect acting as attorney for the tenant.
Since most leases contain a clause which prohibits the tenant from parting with possession of the let property without the landlord’s consent, it was inevitable that eventually a case would come before the courts to consider whether a virtual assignment breached a lease.
Last year, a case on this issue came before the High Court, which ruled that the virtual assignment was in breach of the covenant in the lease not to share or part with possession of the property.
The Court of Appeal has now overruled that decision, considering that the virtual assignment in this case was in effect an agency agreement and the tenant had not parted with possession of the property or been sharing possession of it.
Contact Emma McGlinchey for advice on any commercial property or landlord and tenant matters on [email protected] or call her on 01244 405567
You might also be interested in...
14th September, 2020
Australian legal and business advisory group Pacific Legal Network has continued to expand its reach in the Pacific... Read More »