Close menu

For many of us the concept of what cryptocurrency is can be a difficult one to grasp. However, its increasing popularity has led to the emergence of a quickly evolving area of law with the courts trying to find a way to deal with the unique problems they raise. 

The recent caselaw has highlighted the flexibility of English law in relation to its ability to cope with the rapidly changing technological world. 

What is cryptocurrency? 

Cryptocurrency is the name used to describe ‘digital money’. This digital money can be traded between individuals without the need of a third party, such as a bank, using a type of technology called a ‘blockchain’. A blockchain is like a giant spreadsheet which records all of the transactions. 

An individual can buy and sell cryptocurrency for ‘standard’ currency such as British pounds or dollars. Once you own cryptocurrency, such as bitcoins, these can be stored in your online ‘wallet’.  There are also companies who hold a number of wallets where you can store your cryptocurrency, such as a Bitcoin exchange. You may then use the cryptocurrency in your wallet to buy goods and services or save them as a form of investment. 

The legal problems with cryptocurrency law and the courts approach 

Cryptocurrency is not classed as legal tender in the UK which has caused issues for the court system in terms of best way to deal with them. The court system has now begun to find a way around this problem. 

In the recent case of Danisz v Persons Unknown [2022] EWHC 280 (QB) the court upheld the decision of AA v Persons Unknown that cryptocurrency is a form of property under English law. In this case the Claimant alleged that unknown fraudsters had transferred £27,000 worth of Bitcoin from her wallet into a wallet held in the Second Defendant’s Bitcoin exchange. 

The court granted the following: 

  • An interim injunction preventing the unknown fraudsters and the bitcoin exchange from dealing with the Bitcoins in question in any way; 
  • A Worldwide Freezing Order against the unknown fraudsters; and 
  • A Bankers Trust Order against the Bitcoin exchange. This is where the Bitcoin exchange will need to pass over the details of the blockchain which should help the Claimant find out where the stolen bitcoins are now if they have been moved from the Second Defendant’s wallet. 

The English courts also determined that they had jurisdiction to deal with cryptocurrency where the owner of the cryptocurrency is based in England and Wales. This was further supported by the payment of £27,000 for the Bitcoin being paid from a UK bank account. 

It is important to note however that many of the court’s decisions to date in relation to cryptocurrency involve interim remedies and were uncontested.

Speak to a cryptocurrency solicitor

If you have a dispute relating to cryptocurrency, our solicitors can help you find the best solution. Contact our dispute resolution team today by completing the form below.

Key Contact

Costas Nicolaou

Costas Nicolaou

Dispute Resolution Senior Associate Solicitor

Costas is a Senior Associate Solicitor within our Dispute Resolution team and has built a reputation for his pragmatic approach and commitment to securing optimal outcomes for his clients. 

arrow icon

Latest News

Implications Of The Supreme Court Decision In Finch V. Surrey County Council

Oil Just Stopped: Implications of the Supreme Court Decision in Finch v. Surrey County Council

21 June 2024

Read more
World Cup 2022 News Article 2 1

The 2024 UEFA European Football Championships 2024: HR and Employment Law Issues Employers May Face

20 June 2024

Read more