Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Airport City, Manchester 0844 800 8346

Office 129
Manchester Business Park
3000 Aviator Way
Manchester M22 5TG

Send us a message
Our Offices

First Corporate Manslaughter Conviction

20th March, 2011

Cotswold Geotechnical (Holdings) Ltd has become the first company to be charged with and convicted of corporate manslaughter under the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 (“The Act”).

In 2008, an employee of Cotswold Geotechnical was taking soil samples from the bottom of a trial pit, when the soil collapsed, burying and asphyxiating him. The soil collapse was due to a failure to properly support the walls of the pit. The prosecution asserted that the Company had failed to take all reasonably practicable steps to protect the employee from an unsafe system of work, ignoring well recognised industry guidance and leaving the employee unsupervised on site.

Cotswold was convicted and fined £385,000 to be paid over ten years. The fine represents approximately 250% of the Company’s current turnover (100% of the turnover at the time of the accident) and the judge in the case has said that although it was not his intention to necessarily put Cotswold out of business, if that was the effect then that would be an unfortunate but unavoidable consequence.

The Act (which came into force on 6 April 2008) was introduced to make it easier to prosecute large corporations where a management failing has resulted in death.

Under the Act, an ‘organisation’ will be guilty of corporate manslaughter (or corporate homicide in Scotland) if the way in which its activities are managed or organised by its senior management cause a person’s death and amounts to a gross breach of the relevant duty of care owed to that person.

Critics have argued that the Act was introduced as a way of regulating and punishing large organisations and not necessarily companies of Cotswold’s size. Many have suggested that the use of alternative penalties provided in the Act would have been more appropriate in this situation. These other penalties include making a remedial order which would require the Company to take specific steps to rectify the breach.

This case has been viewed by many as a test case for the legislation and the successful conviction of Cotswold (and heavy penalties imposed on it) demonstrates the importance that businesses of all sizes create and maintain a culture of health and safety compliance. The implementation and regular updating of a comprehensive health and safety policy, ongoing monitoring and regular training will help achieve this.

For more information on this, or any other employment issue please contact Helen Watson on 01244 405565 or email her here.

You might also be interested in...

Ethics Guidance – Transparency in Price and Service

16th November, 2018

It is reported that a quarter of all complaints dealt with by the Legal Ombudsman revolve around costs therefore to avoid complaints and confusion, it is important to be clear from the outset. The new Transparency Rules (which the SRA have now confirmed will come into effect on 6 December 2018) require that accurate and relevant information is... Read More »

Aaron & Partners Increases Recommendations in Leading Industry Guide, The Legal 500

5th November, 2018

Aaron & Partners LLP has once again seen improved rankings in The Legal 500 – a comprehensive guide... Read More »

Mental Health and Stress in the Workplace – 3/3

10th October, 2018

In the lead up to World Mental Health Day on 10 October 2018, we have been posting a series of short articles discussing mental health and stress in the workplace. In this final article, we will be providing tips, to employers and employees, for managing stress and dealing with mental ill health in the workplace. Click here to... Read More »

Contact Us