Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Airport City, Manchester 0844 800 8346

Office 129
Manchester Business Park
3000 Aviator Way
Manchester M22 5TG

Send us a message
Our Offices

GET YOUR S146 NOTICE RIGHT

10th October, 2013

In the recent case of Anders v Haralambous , Mr Justice Jay upheld an appeal against a decision that a lease was forfeit.

This was on the basis that the s146 notice – which is served by a landlord who wishes to commence forfeiture proceedings against a leaseholder following a breach of a lease – had not provided the correct information as to the nature of the breach, which the court had earlier adjudicated upon.

A lease of a house contained two covenants in respect of which complain was made as follows:

The first was “Not to use the premises or permit the same to be used for any purpose whatsoever other than as a self-contained private dwelling for residential purposes only.”

The second was “Not to assign, underlet or part with or share possession or occupation of part only of the premises.”

The district judge had earlier found the tenant had breached the first covenant by using the premises on a commercial basis for lodging students from the language school with which she was associated. This was not use as a private dwelling.

The section 146 notice effectively alleged that the breach was constituted by the subletting for reward.

The findings and conclusions of the district judge Hart were not that there had been a subletting but rather there had been a parting with or sharing of possession.

The judgment demonstrates yet again the importance of getting these notices right to forfeit a lease.

For more information on this or any other property matter please contact Emma McGlinchey on 01244 405567 or email [email protected]

 

You might also be interested in...

3 Requirements of a Valid Pre-Nuptial Agreement

10th July, 2020

[leadThe recent decision of S v H [2020] highlights the important position that signing a pre-nuptial agreement does... Read More »

Villiers v Villiers (2018) EWCA Civ 1120

3rd July, 2020

Brief Background Mr & Mrs Villier married in 1995, and lived in Scotland together until separation in 2012. Once separated, the wife moved to England, but the husband remained living in Scotland. In July 2013 the wife issued a divorce petition in England, but in October 2014 the husband lodged a writ for divorce in Scotland. As the... Read More »

Why claiming inheritance tax relief is not simply horseplay

1st July, 2020

Agricultural property relief from Inheritance Tax has long been a valuable relief for estates, which when available can... Read More »

Contact Us
Secured By miniOrange