Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Airport City, Manchester 0844 800 8346

Office 129
Manchester Business Park
3000 Aviator Way
Manchester M22 5TG

Send us a message
Our Offices

Timing Issue Leads to Tax Argument

16th January, 2014

When a consultant commenced work for a client, her intention was to carry out the work through a limited company.

She ,however, delayed forming the company and because of this her first consultancy invoice was sent to her client before the company had been formed. The invoice was raised in the name of the company she intended to form. The invoice related to work carried out between January and December 2005 and was issued on 31 December 2005. The company was formed on 4 January 2006.

When the invoice (for more than £2 million) was paid, the income was recognised in the consulting company’s accounts, and was not declared as personal income by the consultant.

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) concluded that the income should have been treated as that of the consultant, not the company, which, they argued, could not have earned it since it did not exist at the time the income was earned. Key to their contentions was that the person responsible for paying tax is ‘the person receiving or entitled to’ the profits. Accordingly, they sought to tax the consultant personally (and to charge interest and penalties).

The dispute came before the First-tier Tribunal, which concluded that the consultant would never have been legally entitled to the payment and had not in fact received it personally. HMRC’s contentions were therefore rejected.

The matter would have been very unlikely to have been raised had the invoice been dated a few days later or the company incorporated earlier, and the case clearly illustrates the point that with care and forward planning, potential arguments can be avoided.

 

 

You might also be interested in...

3 Requirements of a Valid Pre-Nuptial Agreement

10th July, 2020

[leadThe recent decision of S v H [2020] highlights the important position that signing a pre-nuptial agreement does... Read More »

Villiers v Villiers (2018) EWCA Civ 1120

3rd July, 2020

Brief Background Mr & Mrs Villier married in 1995, and lived in Scotland together until separation in 2012. Once separated, the wife moved to England, but the husband remained living in Scotland. In July 2013 the wife issued a divorce petition in England, but in October 2014 the husband lodged a writ for divorce in Scotland. As the... Read More »

Why claiming inheritance tax relief is not simply horseplay

1st July, 2020

Agricultural property relief from Inheritance Tax has long been a valuable relief for estates, which when available can... Read More »

Contact Us
Secured By miniOrange