A Wrong Does Not Create A ‘Right’
10th July, 2013
A recent property case illustrated the general point that ‘it is not for the claimants to take advantage of their own wrong’.
When tenants converted the upper part of the building they rented into a flat, in breach of a covenant on the property, and subsequently let the flat on an assured tenancy, the owner of the freehold could not have expected that this would be followed immediately by an application to acquire the freehold reversion of the property under the ‘right to buy’ legislation, which enables the long-term tenants of some properties to acquire the freeholds.
The tenants had applied for consent to convert the first floor of the premises – the ground floor was used by them as a shop – into a flat. Despite the application being refused, they went ahead and did the work anyway. Two days after letting the flat, they applied to acquire the freehold. The owner of the freehold rejected the application.
The dispute went all the way to the Court of Appeal, where LJ Mummery concluded that the property was not a ‘house, reasonably so called’ and therefore was not eligible to be acquired under the ‘right to buy’ legislation.
That decided the matter. However, the Court also considered the issue of whether or not alterations unlawfully made could justify a claim and ruled that the tenants of the building ‘could not enforce a right (i.e. the ‘right to buy’) acquired by committing a wrong (having converted the flat despite the refused application)’.
Landlords will be thankful that the Court has adopted a commonsense approach in this case.
If someone you deal with is seeking to ‘bend rules’ in order to gain an advantage at your expense, contact Chris Parkin on 01244 4055512 or email [email protected] for advice on the appropriate steps to take.
You might also be interested in...
3 Requirements of a Valid Pre-Nuptial Agreement
10th July, 2020
[leadThe recent decision of S v H [2020] highlights the important position that signing a pre-nuptial agreement does... Read More »
Villiers v Villiers (2018) EWCA Civ 1120
3rd July, 2020
Brief Background Mr & Mrs Villier married in 1995, and lived in Scotland together until separation in 2012. Once separated, the wife moved to England, but the husband remained living in Scotland. In July 2013 the wife issued a divorce petition in England, but in October 2014 the husband lodged a writ for divorce in Scotland. As the... Read More »
Why claiming inheritance tax relief is not simply horseplay
1st July, 2020
Agricultural property relief from Inheritance Tax has long been a valuable relief for estates, which when available can... Read More »