Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Manchester 0844 800 8346

Pall Mall Court
61-67 King Street
Manchester M2 4PD

Send us a message
Our Offices

Chatty Emails Do Not Make Contract

25th September, 2013

In a warning to the business community that it can sometimes be hazardous to mix business with pleasure, a judge has emphasised that ‘chatty’ emails, partly devoted to discussion of the provenance and vintage of fine wine, did not conclude a property joint venture contract potentially worth millions.

At a time when the negotiating parties were on cordial terms, it had been agreed by a property development company that a consultancy company would be paid 20 per cent of the gross profits on any projects to which the latter introduced the former.

The consultancy company introduced the developer to an opportunity to develop a block of student housing that had proved highly successful and was projected to generate profits in excess of £8 million. However, following a falling-out between the parties which led to termination of their business relationship, a dispute arose as to whether or not the consultancy company was entitled to 20 per cent commission on those profits.

The High Court noted that the contractual dispute had arisen due to the ‘high level of informality’ in the negotiations between the parties, whose email correspondence was littered with ambiguous shorthand phrases and references to extraneous matters – including the relative merits of different vintages of claret.

Negotiations following the end of the parties’ business relationship had, at points, become ‘hopelessly muddled and confused’. Describing the dispute as ‘regrettable’, the Court noted that it faced a difficult task in attempting to extract evidence of the parties’ intentions from informal email traffic.

A critical email that had sought to set out the terms of agreement had been silent on the issue of the consultant’s commission and the Court concluded that, on a proper interpretation of the available evidence, the consultancy company had relinquished any entitlement to a share of profits from the development.

For more information on this or any other issues please contact Emma McGlinchey on 01244 405567 or email [email protected]

 

You might also be interested in...

Experienced HR leader joins Aaron & Partners LLP

15th May, 2018

Experienced HR leader joins Aaron & Partners LLP Law firm with offices in Chester and Shrewsbury appoints Kate Robertson to drive HR strategy for more than 120 staff and to support the company’s growth Chester law firm Aaron & Partners LLP has strengthened its senior leadership team with the appointment of an experienced human resources manager. Kate Robertson... Read More »

When you should NOT pay the bailiff…

24th April, 2018

Jan Chillery, Insolvency Partner at Aaron & Partners LLP, shares her experience and the reasons why we should be cautious before paying so-called “bailiffs” over the phone or online without vetting them first. My neighbour has told me that recently he had a CCJ (County Court Judgment) against him. A day or so later, he received a phone call... Read More »

Employee awarded 15 years back-pay

11th April, 2018

Jan Chillery, Insolvency Partner comments on the recent case of Mr A M Coletta v Bath Hill Court – Bournemouth Property Management Ltd UKEAT 0200 17 RN To read the Transcript of Proceedings in full please click here “This case highlights an important aspect of the Statute of Limitations which affects a wider field than employment claims. An... Read More »

Contact Us