Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Manchester 0844 800 8346

Pall Mall Court
61-67 King Street
Manchester M2 4PD

Send us a message
Our Offices

Criminal Finance Act 2017 – Failing to prevent tax evasion

8th September, 2017

The Criminal Finance Act 2017 is due to come into force at the end of September. The Act provides that companies and partnerships will be criminally liable if they fail to prevent tax evasion by an employee or external agent.

The regulations cover taxes in the UK and overseas. To be liable there must have been:

  1. Criminal tax evasion by a taxpayer (individual or a firm);
  2. Criminal facilitation of the offence by a representative of the organisation;
  3. The organisation failed to prevent its representative from committing the criminal act (facilitation).

If prosecuted the organisation could be subject to conviction and unlimited penalties.

There is a defence available; it must be shown that the organisation had implemented reasonable prevention procedures or, in the circumstances, it would have been unreasonable and/or unrealistic to expect the organisation to have those procedures in place.

Government guidance recommends the following for applying reasonable procedures:

  1. Carry out a risk assessment of your products, services, client data and internal systems which could be used to facilitate tax evasion.
  2. Have written policies and procedures and allocate resources that are proportionate to your risk profile which will be revealed by the risk assessment referred to above.
  3. Management should communicate that activity intended to facilitate tax evasion is not acceptable.
  4. Use a risk based approach to check the procedures of anybody who performs services on behalf of the organisation. Appropriate due diligence should be carried out.
  5. All staff should be trained on understanding how offences are committed, consequences of non-compliance and how to respond to risks. They should be able to identify red flags.
  6. Prevention procedures should be monitored and reviewed regularly to ensure it remains up-to-date, appropriate and improvements are made where necessary.

If you need assistance with the above, and understanding your responsibilities, please contact our Professional Practices Department.

Paul Bennett

Partner in Professional Practices and Employment Law
Email: [email protected]
Tel: 01743 453685

You might also be interested in...

Why there is more to CSR than just boosting a company’s ego

6th July, 2018

When a business invests in its community it deserves praise – but it must go beyond that, writes Helen Watson, a trustee at Claire House and partner at Aaron and Partners Solicitors. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the link between a company and the community in which it operates. As a trustee on charity boards including Claire House... Read More »

Stuart Haynes reports on IAG Global – Wiesbaden 14th to 17th June 2018

4th July, 2018

Stuart Haynes, Corporate & Commercial Partner and IAG Global Board Member, reports on IAG Global – Wiesbaden held 14th to 17th June 2018 Stuart Haynes (IAG Global Board Member) Stuart Scott-Goldstone and Nick Clarke attended the recent IAG Global meeting in Wiesbaden which was held at the Grand Hotel Nassauer Hof from 14th – and 17th July 2018 The meeting... Read More »

DNA Test ordered in inheritance dispute where paternity questioned

6th June, 2018

Rhiannon Edwards, Solicitor in the Wills, Trusts and Tax department, discusses the recent judgement in the case of Nield-Moir v Freeman, where the High Court has ordered one of two daughters of Colin Birtles, who has died, to take a DNA test to prove paternity as part of an inheritance dispute In an unusual case, the High Court... Read More »

Contact Us