Dismissals & Protected Conversations
12th September, 2016
Many employers are naturally cautious when using “protected conversations” as introduced in 2013 to allow employers and employees to discuss termination of employment on agreed terms.
A protected conversation is when the employer and the employee agree that claims for unfair dismissal can not be pursued after their discussions on a protected conversation basis so that the employer and the employee can discuss potential terms of departure.
The Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) has given its first appeal judgement on protected conversations in a case called Faithorn Farrell Timms LLP – v – Bailey UK EAT/0025/16/RM. The EAT confirmed that Without Prejudice discussions are not applicable to protected conversations, and that the two are distinct. Whilst most lawyers have understood this distinction since the introduction in 2013 of protected conversations, a large number of non-legal advisors have been concerned and confused by which principles apply. If you are conducting a protected conversation as an employer, it is important that you secure agreement to hold a protected conversation under Section 111(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (as amended by the 2013 changes) and that the employee agrees. It is also important that the employer recognises this only applies to unfair dismissal claims, and therefore, claims for discrimination, whistleblowing etc. will be excluded from this protection.
The Faithorn Farrell Timms case has confirmed that the protection extends not just to the content of the protected conversation (e.g. an offer), but also the fact of them taking place at all. This is far broader than the Without Prejudice discussion protection, and employers can increasingly seek to use protected conversations with confidence.
Since the introduction of protected conversations, Employment Law Partner, Paul Bennett, and the wider team at Aaron & Partners, have advised numerous firms on the appropriate use of protected conversations, and enabled many employers to deal with sensitive situations effectively, both in terms of the discussions with the employee who they wish to depart, and commercially effectively by adopting the right negotiating strategy.
For guidance on protected conversations contact Paul Bennett on [email protected] or telephone 01743 453685.
Partner in Employment Law and Professional Practices
Direct Dial: 01743 453685
Email: [email protected]
You might also be interested in...
Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance: Run-off and alternative regulators
18th July, 2018
Special Focus: Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance Run-off – it dominates the thoughts of sole practitioners and partners in smaller law firms in my experience and restricts the ambitions of firms. The SRA could help law firms by relaxing their rules on run-off cover on their Solicitors’ Professional Indemnity Insurance to help firms merge or close more easily. This would protect... Read More »
Senior employment lawyer joins Theatr Clwyd board
17th July, 2018
Helen Watson, Head of Employment Law at Aaron & Partners LLP, has taken up an invitation to become a Trustee of both the Trust Board and the Main Board Theatr Clwyd has bolstered its senior leadership team with the appointment of an experienced employment law solicitor to support its vision of being at the forefront of theatre making... Read More »
Why there is more to CSR than just boosting a company’s ego
6th July, 2018
When a business invests in its community it deserves praise – but it must go beyond that, writes Helen Watson, a trustee at Claire House and partner at Aaron and Partners Solicitors. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the link between a company and the community in which it operates. As a trustee on charity boards including Claire House... Read More »