Chester 01244 405555

Grosvenor Court
Foregate Street Chester
Cheshire CH1 1HG
DX: 19990 Chester

Shrewsbury 01743 443 043

Lakeside House
Oxon Business Park
Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ
DX: 148563 Shrewsbury 14

Manchester 0844 800 8346

Pall Mall Court
61-67 King Street
Manchester M2 4PD

Send us a message
Our Offices

Employment Appeal Tribunal confirms allegations of historical child abuse do not justify dismissal

17th February, 2014

The Employment Appeal Tribunal has confirmed in the recent case of Z v A, A v Z UKEAT/0203/13, that allegations of historical child abuse alone do not amount to some other substantial reason (“SOSR”) justifying dismissal.

A primary school was informed by police that its caretaker, A, was subject to an allegation of historic child abuse. The alleged victim confirmed the allegation to the school, who subsequently suspended A. Although no charges were brought against A during his year-long suspension, following the headteacher’s assertion that there had been a break down of all trust and confidence in A, he was dismissed.

The Employment Tribunal held that the school had failed to show SOSR to justify A’s dismissal. The school had also acted in an unreasonable manner by proceeding straight to dismissal on the mere fact of the allegation. It was held that the school had incorrectly applied the balance between the welfare of its pupils and the interests of the employee. As such, A’s dismissal was unfair.

On appeal by both parties, the Employment Appeal Tribunal upheld the Employment Tribunal’s decision.

The investigating police had not expressed to the school that the allegation was credible nor did they warn the school against employing A. The school’s appeal was therefore dismissed on the basis that SOSR must be “of a kind justifying dismissal” and could not be loosely attached to a case where a fair reason for dismissal cannot be identified.

A also cross-appealed the Tribunal’s decision not to award damages for the psychiatric injury he suffered arising from the dismissal. In dismissing his appeal, the Employment Appeal Tribunal was unable to find that the dismissal had caused the psychiatric injury, as opposed to the allegation itself.

For further information and advice on dealing with conduct outside the workplace, please contact Claire Brook on 01244 405575 or send an email to [email protected].

You might also be interested in...

Experienced HR leader joins Aaron & Partners LLP

15th May, 2018

Experienced HR leader joins Aaron & Partners LLP Law firm with offices in Chester and Shrewsbury appoints Kate Robertson to drive HR strategy for more than 120 staff and to support the company’s growth Chester law firm Aaron & Partners LLP has strengthened its senior leadership team with the appointment of an experienced human resources manager. Kate Robertson... Read More »

When you should NOT pay the bailiff…

24th April, 2018

Jan Chillery, Insolvency Partner at Aaron & Partners LLP, shares her experience and the reasons why we should be cautious before paying so-called “bailiffs” over the phone or online without vetting them first. My neighbour has told me that recently he had a CCJ (County Court Judgment) against him. A day or so later, he received a phone call... Read More »

Employee awarded 15 years back-pay

11th April, 2018

Jan Chillery, Insolvency Partner comments on the recent case of Mr A M Coletta v Bath Hill Court – Bournemouth Property Management Ltd UKEAT 0200 17 RN To read the Transcript of Proceedings in full please click here “This case highlights an important aspect of the Statute of Limitations which affects a wider field than employment claims. An... Read More »

Contact Us